The Sandy Hook Investigations

Politics, History, & 'Conspiracy'
User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 18362
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 8252

The Sandy Hook Investigations

Postby Masato » Wed Nov 27, 2013 12:49 pm

Hey all,

For anyone who has followed this path of crumbs, it is a wild and fascinating mystery. None of what we were told about it makes ANY SENSE at all, and the truth just seems so clouded in shadow it boggles the mind.

Here is a recent presentation I found which was very well-presented:
(most have way too much creepy music and shit for me to stomach, lol)






*edit: here is a short followup from the same presenter:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nc1LeIlwWbE

User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 18362
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 8252

Postby Masato » Wed Nov 27, 2013 1:05 pm

For an example of a more typical 'info-mentary' on the subject:

I haven't watched this one specifically, but its relatively recent and over an hour so I'm guessing the author has likely compiled most of the bits available at the time it was made.

I really encourage anyone to look into this situation... something very strange happened that day, and it was totally different and way bigger/crazier than we were told. The whole media was mindfucked by it, it is an awesome hoax of epic proportions that seems still far from ever being solved.





User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 18362
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 8252

Postby Masato » Mon Feb 17, 2014 12:58 pm

Great new update; Former State Trooper/School Safety expert asks a bunch of SIMPLE questions about the incident... and gets threatened by investigators to STFU and stop asking questions or he will be prosecuted.

Fascinating:

HERE is an article about it, with a transcript of the letter he wrote regarding his harassment:
http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/01/25/re ... nt-page-2/

HERE is the guy's details/credentials (Wolfgang Halbig):
http://childrenssafetyinstitute.com/our-story/

PODCAST INTERVIEW with Wolfgang Halbig:
http://americanfreepress.net/podcast/Sa ... big128.mp3



here are his questions;
"The Pieces Do Not Fit".

· You stated that there was just one suspect and he shot himself in the classroom. Is that correct?

· He shot 20 children and six school staff members. Is that correct?

· He fired 153 rounds using both handguns and a .223 Bushmaster rifle as you stated. Is that correct?

· He shot his way through the front glass door. Is that correct?

· He parked his black Honda civic in the front parent drop off area with all four car doors wide open as Barbara Sibley a parent witness observed. Is that correct?

· He left a 12 gauge Ithaca shotgun in the front seat of the black Honda Civic. Is that correct?

· He took approximately 11 minutes inside the school to kill 20 children and 6 school staff members. Is that correct?


So what has to be CLASSIFIED BY THE FBI? HERE ARE THE WHY’S:

· Why NO Life Star Trauma Helicopter on Dec 14, 2012 since you use them in every active shooter drill when the news media covers your stories. WHY?

· Why did you not allow the Paramedics and EMT’S inside the school after 11 minutes?

· Who was the person who declared all 20 children and six school staff members legally dead? Who?

· Why did it take over an hour to transport someone to the hospital?

· Why do you have a 50 to 60 year old women being transported by ambulance as Natalie Hammond when Natalie Hammond is only 40 years old? Why pretend?

· Why have 26 small Christmas trees behind the Sandy Hook Volunteer fire house on Dec 14, 2012 and then decorate them on Dec 15, 2012 after the shooting? Why?

· Why have a Lieutenant of the Newtown Police Department with 24 years not leave his off duty job where he is controlling traffic at a construction work site until two hours after the shooting started? This is the best one of all. Why?

· Why have a Licensed Registered Nurse who works at Sandy Hook Elementary School that Nancy Lan[z]a the mother of Adam Lan[z]a is a great and wonderful Kindergarten teacher at her school? Why does she lie on National News?

· Why have a Police Chief State in the Newspaper article that his Lt. is not a first responder? Does anyone belief that for one-second especially when you have two Ct State troopers escorting a prisoner to the Danbury courthouse when hearing the active shooter call and respond to Sandy Hook. Why them and not the Lieutenant?

We have all these great police investigators and NO one questions the actions of December 14, 2012.You both then did a great job and deserve an Oscar at the Oscars in Hollywood. Do not send anymore detectives to my home.Please answer my questions if you can.

Thanks
Wolfgang W Halbig

*tipoff courtesy of EvilYoshida

User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 18362
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 8252

Postby Masato » Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:25 pm

HOLY SHIT, this dude is smashing the whole 'official' story to bits.

No closer to the truth, but at least someone is asking the hard (yet incredibly simple) questions. Why are they blocking such simple information?

This is a youtube vid made from the above podcast ^^ with some visuals:




















User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 18362
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 8252

Postby Masato » Mon Feb 17, 2014 9:51 pm

More tips from EY:


“The homes of 15 of the 20 Sandy Hook child victims, 1-2 of the 7 adult victims, and all 6 of the Sandy Hook adult non-victims (the Phelps, Gene Rosen, the three Selectmen) have the mysterious sale date and $0 sale price.

“At the very least, that is interesting. The three Selectmen are especially interesting because if the hypothesis is that the massacre was a contrived event, then Newtown’s highest governing body would have to be “in the know.”

“Your guess is as good as mine as to what all those strange 12/25/2009 sale dates and $0 sale price mean. I’d appreciate input from readers of this blog who are in the real estate business and can shed some light of what the odd sale date and sale price mean.”


lots of new info here:
http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/02/17/sa ... d-players/

And HERE:
http://www.dcclothesline.com/2014/02/14 ... ook-homes/

follow the leads, folks...

we may be on the verge of seeing one of the very strangest stories ever be cracked.

User avatar
Canuckster
Posts: 6742
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 5:24 pm
Reputation: 3081

Postby Canuckster » Mon Feb 17, 2014 11:15 pm

good thread bro.
People say they all want the truth, but when they are confronted with a truth that disagrees with them, they balk at it as if it were an unwanted zombie apocalypse come to destroy civilization.

User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 18362
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 8252

Postby Masato » Tue Feb 18, 2014 1:56 pm

lol check THIS out:
(another tip from EvilYoshida - if you guys like forums like this but x100 go check em out)





User avatar
Daglord
Posts: 1598
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 2:25 pm
Reputation: 2967

Postby Daglord » Fri Aug 01, 2014 2:43 pm

EY is prob the LAST person one should listen to re: sandy hook.

james tracy & memoryholeblog (that you linked above) has some great info though. they have distanced themselves from halbig.

wolfgang's 'child safety institute" & 'sandy hook justice' sites are GONE (after he raised over $30,000 of course) :shock:

no disrespect, just saying... ;)

User avatar
Daglord
Posts: 1598
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 2:25 pm
Reputation: 2967

Postby Daglord » Fri Aug 01, 2014 4:13 pm

james tracy (memoryhole) re: wolfgang & his "handlers"

Wolfgang’s Bad Company
By James F. Tracy
March 19, 2014
http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/03/19/wolfgangs-bad-company/

For two months Wolfgang Halbig has made the rounds on alternative media outlets to explain his doubts on the official narrative of the Sandy Hook massacre. Now the apparently well-intentioned school safety expert has proceeded to establish an online presence, where he has raised over $10,000 toward achieving “Sandy Hook Justice.” An appearance before the Newtown School Board is tentatively scheduled where Mr. Halbig will publicly demonstrate his indignation toward a cover-up.

In early 2013 major and alternative news media alike were beating a path to my door. Reporters quite literally chased me around my place of employment, hoping to obtain the scoop on the “wacko” academic who might recant on his observation that the incident in Newtown was likely a big fraud. Even Anderson Cooper fussed on national television that such an individual was employed at a “taxpayer-funded” institution.

Shortly after this flurry of attention certain parties contacted me and essentially proposed that they become my handlers. The idea was that I would be the public face of a detailed independent investigation into the Sandy Hook episode. For hours they attempted to convince me that the “Sandy Hook actors” were in fact members of the “Greenberg family clan.” They subsequently produced a professional-looking report that I was to tout.

I became increasingly doubtful of the thesis and how it might prove productive. My suspicion turned to alarm when the parties suggested that vigilante justice be visited upon the alleged Sandy Hook perpetrators. Even worse, a website was developed for the investigation that came dangerously close in name and terminology to mirroring a federal law enforcement agency—calling itself the “US Intelligence Information Center” and using jargon such as “suspects” and “persons of interest.” The individual then proceeded to essentially speak for me, posting the report and my name to social media sites. It was at this time that I sent the following email and discontinued further communication:

I was unaware that you posted the report on __________ and included my name and institutional affiliation. This was done without my approval, as was the posting of Sandy Hook Massacre Timeline on the website you’ve created. I am going to have to ask that things slow down and that my attorney review any further activity by you in which you use my name in any way. I also ask that you please not use my aforementioned Timeline.

As for the name of the organization, “US Intelligence Information Center” and website http://www.sandyhookinvestigation.com/ I cannot at this time approve or lend my support. The use of the title “US Intelligence Information Center” and terms such as “Suspects” and “Persons of Interest” are tantamount to impersonating law enforcement and can likely cause a great deal of trouble for all involved.

Sincerely,

James Tracy


Those in the 9/11 Truth movement are well aware of the “cognitive infiltrators” who are only too happy to harness a loose cannon or two that will sabotage or otherwise hinder the genuine remedy of collective intelligence. I am aware that at least one of the parties who misinformed me is now operating as Wofgang Halbig’s handler.

This is unfortunate because despite Halbig’s awkwardness, the overall thrust of his inquiry—legally interrogating the officials overseeing the Sandy Hook event—is a logical next step toward better understanding what took place in Newtown fifteen months ago. Yet my previous experiences indicate that such individuals will likely proceed to lead Mr. Halbig down blind or deceiving alleys that in the end will only serve to further undermine a genuine pursuit of truth.

User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 18362
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 8252

Postby Masato » Fri Aug 01, 2014 8:28 pm

Hey man - what about EY's takes on the subject are you referring to?

I really enjoyed the breakdowns there, it really introduced the whole subject to me. Dude can go pretty far sometimes though that's no doubt. But I think that's kind of fun too lol

Halbig story is indeed a strange one too


Return to “The Grand Chessboard”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 314 guests