Wasn't Global warming fake?

Politics, History, & 'Conspiracy'
User avatar
Edge Guerrero
Posts: 8287
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2013 7:14 am
Reputation: 3064
Location: Smackdown Hotel at "the corner of Know Your Role Blvd

Re: Wasn't Global warming fake?

Postby Edge Guerrero » Mon Aug 14, 2017 1:50 am

- I'm on my cell-phone, it's a cheap small-phone that actually fit's on a pocket, so i can't multi-quote.

- The climate variez day by day, it's very cold here on the south, we got a feel more warming days, and people started telling that we wound't have more winther here, that's where i got the idea if this thread, the thing is we get cold days even on the summer.

Since the economy is going from fossil combustive, that i dislike because the transportation incident's, to eletric vehicles, there's a change on the midia about this.

The distance btw Earth and Sun varies a couple of centimeters/meters, some years get close, some years not , what's is enought to change the way we feel the climate year by year.

So now is really cold here, like it should be this time of year!
- I rent this space for advertising

Don't be selfish, preserve this world for the next generations.

I'll never long for what might have been
Regret won't waste my life again
I won't look back I'll fight to remain

User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 18299
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 8227

Postby Masato » Fri Sep 01, 2017 2:53 pm

for what its worth:

http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-08-29-f ... left.html#

Founder of Weather Channel blasts total fraud of climate change: Science fraud run by the Left

John Coleman, the outspoken retired weatherman who founded the Weather Channel, thinks global warming is a bunch of “silliness” and he doesn’t care who disagrees with him.

In an interview with MyNewsLA.com, the lively Coleman said that San Diego Mayor Kevin Faulconer’s Climate Action Plan turned his stomach. He said, “I think he saw money and power, and I don’t know what else he thought of it. I can’t believe he really [felt he] was going to save the city from some terrible fate.” He added that he felt San Diego is not going underwater in his lifetime or that of his children.

The 82-year-old also derided the tsunami warning route signs found throughout the city, saying that the odds of a major tsunami striking Southern California are roughly the same as that of a flying saucer landing in Lindbergh field.

He says that “Algorian” scientists have been fudging data and accepting billions of dollars worth of research grants from the government in order to be financially comfortable and advance their careers. He feels global warming should be a scientific issue rather an a political one, as people like Al Gore continue to watch their fortunes rise thanks to the global warming scam.

In fact, Gore himself has seen his fortune grow from $2 million in 2001 to an incredible $100 million in 2016 due mainly to his investments in “green tech” businesses. Coleman called Al Gore’s global warming alarmist documentary An Inconvenient Truth a “scientific monstrosity” and said he was happy that his latest movie has not been too successful.

Responding to those who have dismissed his opinion as nonsense, he said: “I’m just a dumb old skeptic — a denier as they call me — who ought to be jailed or put to death. I understand how they feel. But you know something? I know I’m right. So I don’t care.”
Silencing dissenters

Those who are getting rich off of the climate change hoax do not want his voice to be heard and often go out of their way to dispute his comments. Even though he does concede that the earth is getting warmer, he feels this is all due to natural events rather than manmade causes. He said this is also what the commonly quoted “97 percent of scientists” who believe in global warming is actually referring to – the percentage of scientists who believe that the earth is warming.

“You’ve had Ice Ages and glacial periods, warm spells, one after another, cycling back and forth,” he says. “And certainly man didn’t cause any of them. They’re all natural events.”

He also spoke of the time a CBS production company asked to interview him for an hour-long TV special. He says they held conversations and scheduled the interview, but they called to cancel two days prior to the shoot, providing very little in the way of explanation. He said when he asked why it was canceled so abruptly, he was told, “Well, you know.” He says that sort of thing happens to him all the time.

Earlier this year, Coleman told CNN there was no scientific consensus on global warming. He said that there is as much as $2.5 billion in government climate science research funding available each year, and climate scientists who want to get their hands on that money need to come out in favor of the global warming position.

He also pointed to a petition that has been signed by more than 31,000 scientists stating that there is “no convincing scientific evidence” the human release of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide and methane is causing a catastrophic heating of our atmosphere and disrupting the planet’s climate.

User avatar
Winnson
Posts: 2373
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 7:57 am
Reputation: 1284

Postby Winnson » Fri Sep 01, 2017 8:01 pm

20 years ago we were moving towards another ice age if I remember correctly.

Don't forget to pay your carbon tax! Science rules!


Alfredo
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2017 7:56 am
Reputation: 21

Postby Alfredo » Sat Sep 02, 2017 1:59 am

It's annoying because it's a huge distinction from the real things causing destruction to our environmental like fukishima, acid wash mining, billions of tonnes of plastic, chemical agriculture etc
Less o2 means trees go bigger and brighter, crops have bigger and healthier yields and less forrest fires. Ironically we are destroying environment trying to artificially achieve these higher yields with chemical fertilisers, pesticides and herbicides which not only fuks environment but is giving us all cancer and the like.
Higher temperatures means less human deaths (about 20 times more people die from cold than heat), and we could actually make good use from currently almost unusable land like Greenland and Antarctica.

But we will never get to experience this utopia if we are herded to be so preoccupied with a colourless, odourless, non-toxic gas and are blinded or are ignoring the main issues and continue to poison the food chain.
Ie.
Image
Image
Image
Image


Return to “The Grand Chessboard”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 94 guests