This is fascinating from both a JFK and an Operation Mockingbird/MSM propaganda point of view;
an actual CIA Operation Mockingbird dispatch outlining direction for how to handle criticism of the Warren Commission Report:
DISPATCH:COUNTERING CRITICISM OF THE WARREN REPORT
https://history-matters.com/archive/jfk ... _0003a.htm

People starting to figure things out, more people talking, books being written... SOUND ARGUMENTS AND QUESTIONS ARISING:

Saying that such suspicion goes way beyond JFK and threatens the credibility of the entire US government system. Says President Johnson is trending as a prime suspect:

So what is the strategy?
Here the CIA is directing MSM (adressees) to AVOID THE TOPIC ALL TOGETHER... But in the case "where discussion is active however, addressees are requested:)

Just keep repeating that "No significant new evidence has emerged...". No need to read any of the latest books, or listen to anyone's research, just deny and repeat that there is no significant new evidence. Notice there is no statute of limitations on this directive, lol:

( ^^the part in red is interesting as a side note... they are admitting here that the Reichstag fire was NOT started by Nazis, even though that has been a running conspiracy theory in the MSM ever since)
Here the direct MSM to use the argument that a conspiracy of this size "...would be impossible to conceal in the United States.". Just make it seem impossible, absurd. They also give the direction to bring up the fact that it was done out in the open, in public, saying this too would be too hard to pull off and that any such conspirators would likely kill JFK under "...more secure conditions":

^ notice how they are instructed to keep the discussion VAGUE like this, belief/non-belief vs any hard facts.
Here however they direct how to handle more specific questions if ever they are faced with them:
- how to talk about Lee Harvey Oswald
- how to handle criticism that the Warren Report was 'a rush job'
- how to handle talk of mysterious deaths of people involved in the investigation:

it goes on for 9 more pages, the dispatch contains reviews of specific books concerning JFK conspiracy, and how to counter them (much of it directs just to slander all the authors as 'communists', lol) It breaks down the main points and theories of these books (which I have not read yet but will they may be enlightening) and the directed methods how to counter each point
It keeps mentioning about the author 'Epstein' as an author of a book of concern. This would also be an interesting point of further research... was he a disinfo shill CIA creation? Or just a bad/crackpot conspiracy theorist they promoted as a strawman? interesting...

