Thoughts on coronavirus...

Politics, History, & 'Conspiracy'
User avatar
Megaterio Llamas
Posts: 3378
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 7:56 pm
Reputation: 2306

Re: Thoughts on coronavirus...

Postby Megaterio Llamas » Wed Apr 07, 2021 4:53 pm

Masato wrote:
Megaterio Llamas wrote:


'even fully vaccinated travellers'?

Does that mean the vaccine doesn't work?


The variants Mas. Canada is now riddled with Covid variants like the Brazilian strain. it is unknown how effective the vaccines are in preventing the infection and spread of these nasties. This travel warning was just issued now by the way.
el rey del mambo

User avatar
Megaterio Llamas
Posts: 3378
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 7:56 pm
Reputation: 2306

Postby Megaterio Llamas » Wed Apr 07, 2021 6:58 pm

Image
el rey del mambo

User avatar
Megaterio Llamas
Posts: 3378
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 7:56 pm
Reputation: 2306

Postby Megaterio Llamas » Wed Apr 07, 2021 10:35 pm

I've been taking Vitamin D for about nine months now. I really hope you guys are too. Please do my friends.


Dr. Ryan Cole Blows The Whole COVID-19 Propaganda Away

video link: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/04/no_ ... anda-away/

Cliff notes

Dr. Ryan Cole is the CEO and Medical Director of Cole Diagnostics, one of the largest independent labs in the State of Idaho. Dr. Cole has conducted over 100,000 Covid-19 lab tests and treated over 350,000 patients over his medical career.


Coronavirus infections are seasonal
Average COVID-19 age of death 78.6 years. Average annual US age of death historically 78.6 years.
Face mask wearing outdoors is absolute insanity. No study shows any super-spreader event outdoors. The best mask of all is your immune system.
There is no such thing as cold and flu season. There is only low vitamin D season.
Inflammatory (cytokine) storm cannot be controlled without adequate vitamin D levels.
Massive numbers of Americans have low vitamin D levels.
96% of ICU patients are vitamin D deficient
You cannot synthesize vitamin D from sunlight during fall and winter at 35-degrees north.
You living in northern climates you are immune suppressed if you do not supplement with vitamin D during fall and winter.
Scandinavian countries (Finland, Norway, Sweden) test their citizens twice a year for vitamin D and fortify 35 foods with vitamin D.
Our population is left vulnerable to any seasonal viral infection without a public health program to promote vitamin D adequacy.
There is not social disparity of care but the fact darker skin pigmentation inhibits sunshine vitamin D synthesis in the skin.
Fauci says he personally takes 8000-9000 units of vitamin D per day but why has this has not become a public health message?
The top three public health messages should be: 1- vitamin D; 2- vitamin D; 3- vitamin D.
By law, the federal government cannot approve a vaccine if there is a proven treatment. That would be Ivermectin.
The government is in bed with a vaccine company; both the federal government and Moderna co-hold patents on their RNA vaccine. The “fox is guarding the henhouse.”
The drug Remdesivir only works during the first 2-3 days of the infection. It does not increase survival. It is like “peeing on a forest fire.”
Four billion doses of Ivermectin have safely taken Ivermectin. Death rate decreased 70-90% in hospitals treating COVID-19 patients.
Of the half million COVID-19 deaths in North America, there would be 375,000 less deaths if Ivermectin were used! Public health officials have blood on their hands. 100% of Ivermectin-treated patients don’t get ill. Works for all genetic variants.
The vaccines are an experiment on society.
The vaccine is unproven and long-term safety data is not even being
You can get Ivermectin from doctors online. Myfreedoctor.com.
el rey del mambo

User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 15270
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 7044

Postby Masato » Thu Apr 08, 2021 1:23 pm

Here is a PDF you can download

It was written in 2017 as a 'hypothetical' predictive modelling exercise.

What's weird though is that aside from being a couple years off, it pretty much describes EXACTLY what happened/what is happening.

Please download and read, and tell me if you think its just a coincidence:

https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org ... enario.pdf

User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 15270
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 7044

Postby Masato » Thu Apr 08, 2021 3:05 pm

This is really great

A detailed breakdown of the web of corruption/HUGE conflicts of interest behind those most responsible for directing Canada's lockdown response.

All the major players have direct ties and are invested in/receiving money from Big Pharma, Gates Foundation, World Economic Forum, etc.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST at the highest levels showing clear motivation for these individuals to steer this situation along a pre-determined path

PLEASE WATCH:



Creators: K. Wand & W.G. Gervais
Narration / Producer: K. Wand
Audiovisual / Editing / Producer: W.G. Gervais
https://very-opinionated.com/works/trag ... n-ontario/

Written with a team of researchers, contributors & collaborators.

For the most relevant and accurate c19 data, please follow Kelly Brown:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQsQL1 ... je2IBKNVXA
https://twitter.com/rubiconcapital_?s=11

[spoiler]
Written & produced by Kate Wand, W.G. Gervais, and a team of researchers, contributors & collaborators.


As many jurisdictions in the United States and elsewhere are bringing their lockdowns and restrictions to a halt, Ontario is buckling down. Impervious to the real world data demonstrating the immense death and destruction caused by lockdowns, and the uselessness of mask mandates, PCR testing and social distancing, this largest Canadian province continues to oppress its citizens with its catastrophically harmful, unscientific edicts.

“A three-week lockdown in some parts of Ontario was recommended by the government’s COVID-19 Science Advisory Table this week, which warned of “exponential growth,” fuelled by variants of concern, which now account for over half of new infections.” Says the National Post, in an article titled ‘Canadians still stuck in the endless lockdown cycle’

Notwithstanding the copious amount of evidence that lockdowns do not control the spread of the virus, and despite the fact that this province’s numbers have never been out of control, the ICUs have similar burdens as recent years, that the vast majority of infected people requiring hospitalization are elderly, and nearly half with comorbidities, Ontario’s Science Table, and other Covid-interested organizations such as Global Canada, continue to propagate fear-mongering, doomsday predictions, and advocate for heavy and hard lockdowns.

The Ontario Science Table was created as a covid response team to inform and advise the government. Ontario Premier Doug Ford religiously bends to their warnings, and his policy decisions — to lockdown or to open — are heavily influenced by their forecasting models and pseudoscience.

Peter Juni, the Ontario Science Table’s scientific director, recently stated to the CBC, “Right now in Ontario, the pandemic is completely out of control,” referring to a paper published on ‘variants of concern’ and a projection of ICU admissions in younger patients.

He further went on to warn that “winning this race” with vaccinations alone wouldn’t be enough.

This is very concerning, considering Peter Juni’s most recent fear-mongering warning to the government to impose a “complete lockdown of all indoor spaces.” which includes shutting down travel between regions and paid leave for what is referred to as ‘essential workers’.

Meanwhile, in Texas, where all restrictions have been lifted, including mask mandates and social distancing, cases and deaths are on a steady decline, as one would expect from a respiratory virus this time of the year, in line with the well known Hope-Simpson curve.

The Ontario Covid19 Science Advisory Table is comprised of over 30 academics from various disciplines, most of which, like Juni, are members of the University of Toronto’s Dalla Lana school.

They focus on predictive modelling of cases and deaths based on the comparison of current behaviours vs. no intervention vs. heavy restrictions and lockdowns. Their mysterious methodologies have a notoriously terrible track record, with their estimations of sickness and death consistently multiple times higher than reality.

For example, David Fisman, epidemiologist and professor at Dalla Lana, and one of their highest profile and most vocal members on social media, tweeted on January 12th, 2021, that there was ‘tsunami of death’ coming, which of course, turned out to be false. Ironically, he hoped there would be “consequences for those who knowingly pushed disinformation.”

In a paper Fisman co-authored with Juni in May 2020, they drew the astonishing conclusion that “seasonality is likely to play only a minor role in the epidemiology of COVID-19, while public health interventions (school closures, restricting mass gatherings, social distancing) appear to have a major impact.” This directly contradicts decades-long, strongly supported science on seasonality for respiratory infections.

Admittedly, the authors state that the “study has a number of important limitations.”, in total seven, of which the first is “because of considerable differences in testing practices between different geopolitical areas, actual rates of COVID-19 could not be reliably estimated.”

The paper also states that “China was excluded as its epidemic growth had decelerated and the outbreak appeared to be contained.”, mirroring the official narrative told by the CCP, that ‘non-pharmaceutical interventions’ such as lockdowns could contain the virus.

It therefore appears that the study is extremely flawed, and is merely a piece of propaganda to support the justification for the imitation of China’s lockdown experiment and other extreme, never-before-heard of social mitigation measures, rather than sound science.

Fisman is also an extremely loud advocate for restrictions that are seriously detrimental to children despite all evidence of their unnecessary nature and immense harms, such as school closures, mask mandates, and social isolation. In May 2020, he lamented how he had not hugged his own children since the beginning of the Covid debacle.

As if that wasn’t enough, Fisman has a multitude of conflicts of interest listed in his resume, which include big pharma brands Pfizer and AstraZeneca, JP Morgan & Chase, the We foundation, the Ontario Nurses Association and the Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario.

Anthony Furey reported for the Toronto Sun that Fisman “was retained by the Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario to offer an argument against the Ontario government’s school reopening plans at an Ontario Labour Relations Board hearing. This work was taken on at the same time Fisman was serving on the science table, which advises the government on matters including school reopenings.”

He was accused of hiding this significant conflict of interest, and became extremely defensive and denigrating to his critics.

When this was brought to light, Chrystia Freeland, Federal Deputy Prime Minister, publicly rushed to his defense. What reasons would the right hand of the Prime Minister have to get intermingled in petty social media disputes and slight press criticism regarding provincial-level politics?

Then we have Global Canada, a previously dormant organization founded in 2014 by Robert Greenhill, that suddenly became very active in October 2020, following a mega financial contribution of over half a million dollars by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. They funded a “taskforce” called The COVID Strategic Choices Group, meant to inform the gov’t pandemic response with a goal of Zero Covid, citing AUS, NZ, Taiwan as examples to follow.

They call this strategy the “Canadian Shield”, and its methodologies include test and trace, isolation, and heavy, hard, ongoing national lockdowns, with closed borders, all of which it advocated for in a policy paper published on December 30, 2020 called, “Building the Canadian Shield”

Ontario Science Table members, including David Fisman, promoted the paper upon its publication. Although they are separate entities, the Covid Strategic Choices group created by Global Canada has members on the OST, such as Andrew Morris, and who contribute to the OST, such as Ashleigh Tuite, infectious disease epidemiologist, mathematical modeller, and assistant professor at U of T’s Dalla Lana.

Interestingly, shortly after the time that Global Canada was revived after receiving Gates money, Tuite, who regularly publishes papers with Fisman, attended a virtual conference in Beijing on Covid response, featuring key notes speakers from the WHO and Chinese Center for DIsease control and prevention.

Another example of the enmeshment is the social media bromance between Ontario Science Table’s David Fisman and Zero Covid hysterics such as Ryan Imgrund and Irfan Dhalla. This trio is notorious for sharing doomsday scenarios and grossly exaggerated predictions.

If we consider the notion that Global Canada is a globalist organization founded on the apocalypse-is-nigh principles of “global impact” and social justice, it makes sense that members of its Covid council are Malthusians; cult-like ideologues who believe humans are a cancer to the planet. Robert Greenhill founded Global Canada in 2014,a “multistakeholder initiative committed to improving Canada’s global impact.”, after returning to Canada following his significant, over half a decade long role as managing director at the World Economic Forum.

Greenhill began his career working for McKinsey, a controversial consulting firm with deep ties to the bill and Melinda gates foundation, the WHO, and the opioid crisis. McKinsey offered Covid pandemic guidance and recovery support to the US and other governments around the world, including an unsolicited offer to Ontario for 1.6 million dollars.

McKinsey’s former global managing director Dominic Barton offered a “big helping hand to Ottawa’s economic advisory council—for free” in 2016, while active at McKinsey. He has very close ties with the Liberal Party, and has now moved onto his role as Canadian ambassador to China.

McKinsey’s Ontario headquarters are conveniently located at the university of Toronto campus, the same U of T that boasts the majority of the Ontario Science Table’s members.

If this web of characters and organizations seems overwhelmingly obscure and confusing, it’s because it is. There are many more alliances to investigate in the Ontario Covid Zero Swamp, but let’s end with Eileen Devilla, Toronto’s ‘top doctor’, and yet another university of Toronto faculty member at the Dalla Lana school.

Aside from the obvious conflict of interest resulting from her husband’s ties to big pharma, she has been an unrelenting public health tyrant throughout this last year, exercising her unelected powers to switch off the lights on thousands of businesses and households in Toronto, including the permanent closures of an incommensurable number of restaurants in the GTA. The Adam Skelly fiasco, when his BBQ restaurant had the locks changed overnight and over 250 police officers showed up the next day in a breathtakingly unprecedented abuse of force, were all the direct result of Devilla’s orders.

DeVilla is a fear-mongering lockdown lord, with a stone-cold disposition, but there are cracks in her armour. She recently posted on social media: “Data show a worsening Covid19 resurgence in TO, including hospital and ICU admissions among younger people.”

After a humiliating confrontation by Covid19 data analyst Kelly Brown, where he stated, “Dr. de Villa, I do not see in the data the rises in hospital & ICU admissions among younger people that you are referring to. What am I missing? There appear to be no material changes in the age makeup, including stable average age among Toronto ICU patients.”, and pointed to the actual data, Devilla quietly changed her post from “data show” to “we’re hearing”.

These are the types of blatant lies, omissions and misinformation that the Covid Zero Cult are guilty of. Their sticky spiderweb is infested with conflicts of interests that include big pharma, the bill and Melinda gates foundation, the WHO, the WEF and possibly links to the Communist Party of China, and this is just the tip of the iceberg.

They produce questionable scientific papers in what appears to be an attempt to provide the conclusions they seek, in order to justify their harmful recommendations.

How can these conflicts and the perverse incentives they create possibly lend themselves to good, sound and holistic public health policy helpful to the constituents and society they serve?

They have been consistently and dramatically wrong about their predictions, yet aggressively continue to push for hard restrictions, indefinite lockdowns, and abusive policies that disproportionately affect small businesses and children.

The Ontario Science Table’s David Fisman even went so far as to endorse “intentional mass unemployment.”

Even if their terribly inaccurate modelling projections turned out to be correct, or their apocalyptic prophecies came true even once, Lockdowns were never a part of the repertoire for dealing with a pathogen, or any other government-declared emergency. They violently oppose every pre-existing public health guideline in the western world for how to deal with a pandemic. The amount of destruction, suffering and death resulting from the brutal lockdowns has been cataclysmic, and will ripple into the future of all its victims. They are the true ‘tsunamis of death’.

To quote Peter Juni’s latest statement of moral panic, “it’s important now that everybody just wakes up and comes out of denial.”

User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 15270
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 7044

Postby Masato » Thu Apr 08, 2021 5:02 pm

Austrian Court Rules PCR Test Not Suitable For COVID-19 Diagnosis And That Lockdowns Has No Legal Basis

https://greatgameindia.com/austria-court-pcr-test/

Following the Portuguese, German and Dutch rulings, now the Austrian court has ruled that PCR tests are not suitable for COVID-19 diagnosis and that lockdowns has no legal or scientific basis.

The Vienna Administrative Court granted a complaint by the FPÖ against the prohibition of its meeting registered for January 31 in Vienna.

“The prohibition was wrong,” the court said says in the ruling (read judgement below).



The court stated on the basis of scientific studies that the grounds for the prohibition put forward by the Vienna State Police Department are completely unfounded.



The court agrees with the statements in the complaint “on all points” and even goes far beyond the arguments put forward by the FPÖ itself.

It is expressly pointed out that, even according to the World Health Organization (which took a u-turn only after Biden took office), “a PCR test is not suitable for diagnosis and therefore does not in itself say anything about the disease or infection of a person”.



“However, the Minister of Health uses a completely different, much broader case definition for Covid-19 diagnosis, which cannot be used to justify the prohibition of a meeting.”



The court came to the conclusion that the “information” from the Vienna City Health Service, on which the prohibition by the Vienna State Police Department was based, “did not contain any valid and evidence-based statements or findings on the pandemic”.

Based on the definitions of the Minister of Health, “Case definition Covid-19” from December 23, 2020, a “confirmed case”:


1 - is any person with evidence of SARS-CoV-2-specific nucleic acid (PCR test), regardless of clinical manifestation or
2 - any person with evidence of SARS-CoV-specific antigen that meets the clinical criteria or
3 - any person with evidence of SARS-CoV-specific antigen that meets the epidemiological criteria.

Thus none of the three “confirmed cases” defined by the Minister of Health meets the requirements of the WHO concept of “sick / infected person”. The WHO refuses to rely solely on the PCR test (confirmed case 1).

In a similar ruling, a Portuguese appeals court has ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test.

A German court in a landmark ruling has declared that COVID-19 lockdowns imposed by the government are unconstitutional.



Thuringia’s spring lockdown was a “catastrophically wrong political decision with dramatic consequences for almost all areas of people’s lives,” the court said, justifying its decision.

https://greatgameindia.com/portuguese-c ... nreliable/
https://greatgameindia.com/german-court ... itutional/

User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 15270
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 7044

Postby Masato » Sun Apr 11, 2021 1:43 pm

Listen to this talk

Those skeptical of the vaccine and vaccine passports are openly called 'fruit loops', 'nutcases', and people who 'haven't read deeply into it'

Calls for 'No Jab, No Job', and open Censorship of opinion - everyone nods their heads


User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 15270
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 7044

Postby Masato » Sun Apr 11, 2021 1:56 pm

https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/04 ... rces/COVID


1. Coved killed by sunlight
2. No direct evidence of airborne spread
3. Surface spread very rare
4. Asymptomatic spread low
5. Masks ineffective
6. Lockdowns don’t work
7. Herd immunity real
8. Miniscule risk to children
9. Survival rate 99.97%+

1. “When researchers at the National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center exposed SARS-CoV-2 in simulated saliva to artificial sunlight (equivalent to a sunny day), 90% of viruses were inactivated within seven minutes.”
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jvchamary/ ... ronavirus/

1. “The present study is the first to demonstrate that UVB levels representative of natural sunlight rapidly inactivate SARS-CoV-2 on surfaces”…
https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/222/2/214/5841129

2. “[The CDC] has reversed an update made to its coronavirus guidance that stated COVID-19 is an airborne virus. The health agency said that update, posted to its website… was made in error.” (It later said it was “possible.”)
https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/ ... 0e8972428d?

2. “There is absolutely no evidence that this disease is airborne”…
https://bc.ctvnews.ca/absolutely-no-evi ... -1.4964156

3. “[The CDC] just released a new scientific brief that says your risk of contracting COVID-19 from a surface is about 1 in 10,000. That means, on average, you have a 0.01% chance of actually picking up the virus from, say, touching a counter.”
https://news.yahoo.com/risk-getting-cov ... 00830.html

4. “[A] meta-analysis of 54 studies with 77,758 total participants… found that secondary attack rates were higher for symptomatic people than asymptomatic people — an 18% rate for symptomatic people and a 0.7% rate for asymptomatic people.”
https://tallahasseereports.com/2020/12/ ... -to-study/

5. “We did not find evidence that surgical-type face masks are effective in reducing laboratory-confirmed influenza transmission, either when worn by infected persons (source control) or by persons in the general community.”
Analysis of COVID mask data.
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article

5. “Researchers in Denmark reported… that surgical masks did not protect the wearers against infection with the coronavirus in a large randomized clinical trial.”
https://fee.org/articles/new-danish-stu ... infection/

5. “Recommendation to wear a surgical mask when outside the home among others did not reduce, at conventional levels of statistical significance, incident SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with no mask recommendation.”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medica ... r-BB1b8zo2

5. The top 10 states in case rates over the past 7 days all still have mask mandates
Image


5. “In the first 20 days after implementing mask mandates, new cases slowed by 0.5 percentage points… COVID-19 death rates dropped by 0.7 percentage points…”
Thus, not even a 1% difference in one CDC study.
https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/fact ... 938262002/

6. “A study evaluating COVID-19 responses around the world found that mandatory lockdown orders early in the pandemic may not provide significantly more benefits to slowing the spread of the disease than other voluntary measures”…
https://www.newsweek.com/covid-lockdown ... ws-1561656

6. “We do not question the role of all public health interventions, or of coordinated communications about the epidemic, but we fail to find an additional benefit of stay-at-home orders and business closures.”
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eci.13484

6. “188 countries that have declared at least one case, only those counting a minimum of 10 deaths due to Covid-19 were included… Stringency of the measures settled to fight pandemia, including lockdown, did not appear to be linked with death rate.”
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10 ... 9/full#SM6

6. “[Tel Aviv researchers] found no statistical correlation between the severity of a lockdown and the number of Covid-19 fatalities in the country.”
https://www.israel21c.org/distancing-no ... ays-study/

6. “We in the [WHO] do not advocate lockdowns… The only time we believe a lockdown is justified is to buy you time to reorganize, regroup, rebalance your resources, protect your health workers who are exhausted, but by and large, we’d rather not do it.”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medica ... r-BB19TBUo

6. “During the study period, states allowed restaurants to reopen for on-premises dining in 3,076 (97.9%) U.S. counties. Changes in daily COVID-19 case & death growth rates were not statistically significant”…
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/ ... mm7010e3_w

7. “Fauci has been saying that the country needs to vaccinate 70% to 85% of the population to reach herd immunity from Covid-19. But he inexplicably ignores natural immunity. If you account for previous infections, herd immunity is likely close at hand.”
https://www.wsj.com/articles/herd-immun ... 1616624554

7. “Experts believe that if no other measures are taken, herd immunity could kick in when between 50% and 70% of a population gains immunity via vaccination… the number most people are looking at (for herd immunity) is about 60-65%.”
https://graphics.reuters.com/HEALTH-COR ... (EXPLAINER)/gjnvwayydvw/

8. The CDC reports that 251 patients under 17 years old have died with COVID since the pandemic began.

There are 74.2 million Americans under 18. That is a survival rate for that age demographic of about 99.9997%. The survival rate for 18-29 is about 99.997%.
Image


9. The average age of COVID death is 78.6 years old. The average age of life expectancy for those patients was 78.6 years old. Overall survival rate 99.97%.

“CDC data also show that Americans, regardless of age group, are far more likely to die of something other than COVID-19.”
Image

User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 15270
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 7044

Postby Masato » Sun Apr 11, 2021 7:00 pm

Alberta Christian Church's pastor was JAILED for not obeying lockdowns.

Police BARRICADED the church.

Now Christians have gathered right outside in spite of it, singing hymns.

Then, they tore down the fence:




User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 15270
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 7044

Postby Masato » Sun Apr 11, 2021 10:22 pm

aaaaaand then the police came in full army-style. 220+ armed riot police. Over 40 vehicles, according to whomever filmed this:

What a sequence of events!

Amazing. Canada is now 100% some new kind of state:



Return to “The Grand Chessboard”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests