Why Men Think About The Roman Empire Daily

[Luigi]

You have probably seen the meme by now. ^Fun breakdown by the Lotuseaters.

[Professor Diet Butcher]

Best answer ever...

[Masato]

An embarrassing confession I'll share with you guys, this is a good thread for it;

The Tartaria/Erased Old World Empire theories have recently scrambled my brain to a point where I am starting to question whether the whole 'extent of the Roman Empire' story may be some kind of fiction to coverup the true history of Tartaria or some other Old World Empire that may have been even bigger that the Roman Empire.

Mostly I've been tripping out on examples of architecture supposedly from the late 1800's in N America that are absolutely spectacular and are all so obviously 'Roman' in style, yet TONS of them were all destroyed around the same time in suspicious fires, or the ones that survived or kept were 'founded' and repurposed into Capitol buildings, post offices, banks, insane asylums etc. All these buildings do not look like they belong there. No construction photos, unsastisfying explanations who built them, why, or how.

They ALL look 'Roman', huge stone columns, that same triangular top design, huge domed structures with the same kind of spires on top, etc etc, whereas the best explanation for the similarities in design often get chalked up to Freemasonry.


Please friends, help me come back from the brink of insanity

PS: I'm serious lol.
Luigi, have you looked at any of this stuff? How retarded is it? lol I need a good debunking.
Sometimes when I let myself go too far with these theories I start seeing a social media trend about men thinking about the Roman Empire as another psyop to cement the false narrative further because folks are starting to figure shit out.

Help my tinfoil susceptibilities, friends

Like the men from these videos, I also probably think about this in some capacity every day lol

[Masato]

These are all examples of architecture supposedly built late 1800's/early 1990's in the USA, before power tools, when most of the USA was riding horse and buggies on dirt roads.

Most research available will tell you they were built in a span of 1-2 years, then destroyed in a fire.
Over and over again, same story.

Seriously wtf

Could this have ANYTHING to do with what we are told was the 'Roman Empire'?


Most of these buildings do not exist anymore, some still do but they still beg the question imo:
There are TONS like this, only the tip of the iceberg here:

[Masato]

sorry if this is way off topic, I thought this was an interesting angle to bridge the topic.

I know Luigi knows a lot about Roman Empire and more traditional history.

Thanks friends, this has been bothering me lately lol

[Masato]

Existing US Capitol buildings

Just a few - almost all US Capitol buildings are similar. All with fishy construction stories and almost zero construction photos:

Same with hundreds of banks, libraries, post offices, jails, mental asylums etc all over USA and CANADA:

Do these all not look 'Roman'?

[Luigi]

Mas, people emulate the architectural style of classical Europe 1 to be symbolic that these are the roots of our civilization, and 2 because its stylistically excellent. This probably isnt the kind of thing I should be telling you but if you look at Berlin and Dresden before they were burned to smoldering rubble they were full of classical architecture built in the romantic era.

Also note, the suffix -ia just means "land" in Latin. "Tartaria" is just Latin for "Tartarland". The Tartars are the nomadic Turkic tribes who roamed the Eurasian steppe from c.500-1900 AD. There are maps with giant areas called Tartaria because thats the Eurasian steppe which was mostly arctic wasteland that Tartars wandered through.

[Masato]

Mas, people emulate the architectural style of classical Europe 1 to be symbolic that these are the roots of our civilization, and 2 because its stylistically excellent. This probably isnt the kind of thing I should be telling you but if you look at Berlin and Dresden before they were burned to smoldering rubble they were full of classical architecture built in the romantic era.

Also note, the suffix -ia just means "land" in Latin. "Tartaria" is just Latin for "Tartarland". The Tartars are the nomadic Turkic tribes who roamed the Eurasian steppe from c.500-1900 AD. There are maps with giant areas called Tartaria because thats the Eurasian steppe which was mostly arctic wasteland that Tartars wandered through.

Awesome, I was hoping you'd chime in.

Dresdin etc unfortunately does not help my susceptibility to this theory.

In fact the theory may go to suggest that a possible motivation for WWI/WWII may have been specifically to destroy more evidence of the Old World.
There is a definite timeline IMO from the mass destruction of old architecture in N America, to the creation of the Federal Reserve, to WWI and the destruction of monarchies, more old architecture destroyed no doubt, all the way to WWII, Dresdin as you say.
The Nazis were to be absolutely defeated on all levels, yet they too seemed to have discovered some hidden history, some truths about the 'Aryan' civilization that they too claimed to have been covered up/erased. Perhaps their reverence for the swastika had something to do with this...?

Also I'm not convinced that young new architect geniuses in N America would indeed copy the old world style so precisely. What is the point?
Would they not have any desire to come up with something new? To push their skills? To design a more modern, Americanized style of architecture that would ensure their legacy, etc? Why build these replicas of another country's history?

...

Please understand I am not really taking this theory seriously, nor am I trying to argue or debate it with any vigor. I'm just playing devils advocate for the theory because I'm still yet unsatisfied to put it to bed and am curious how someone with your education would see it.

If I am saying stupid shit anywhere please have the heart to tell me, lol I can take it & respect your understands of history to be far better than mine

[Masato]

Also I'm not so stuck on the specific name 'Tartaria' or whatever. All I've seen to push that name are some old maps like you say.

If there was some global empire that was erased/repurposed etc as the theory wonders, perhaps that was not it's name.

Anyways these ideas are really intriguing me these days for some reason. Hope I'm not hijacking this thread too badly.

[Masato]

I just came across something about the FAIRMONT EMPRESS HOTEL in Victoria BC; An absolutely massive, amazing hotel with the most grandiose pillars and interior you could imagine.

As a test, I did a little experiment - As I suspected, many similar anomalies to what has caught my attention

1. The hotel was built in 4 years (1904-1908). Without power tools, without trucks, without cranes, etc etc etc

2. I looked for maybe 20 minutes, on historical/official websites etc. I could not fine ONE SINGLE PHOTO of it being built.
This is a big part of this rabbit hole, many buildings you can find some scaffolding photos but almost never actual mid-construction photos.

3. During a renovation in 1988, they 'discovered' an incredible stained glass ceiling that had been previously covered up by wood. They didn't know it was there? wut?

4. During another renovation, the engineering staff from the hotel confirmed that there was what has been described as a TUNNEL that ran from James Bay into the basement of the Empress. It is not clear what the purpose was.

This was all built in 4 years? without electricity?

[spoiler]

The supposed architect of the hotel ALSO designed the Victoria parliament buildings just across the street.

The parliament buildings supposedly were also built in only 5 years (without power tools, trucks, cranes, etc)

SAME EXACT STYLE as most of the Capitol buildings in the USA.

ALSO, I again could not find a SINGLE PHOTO of mid-construction of these amazing buildings

This was all built in 5 years?
Before power tools, trucks, cranes?
in a town with only 20,000 people?

[spoiler]

I'd be willing to bet similar buildings in Canada would turn up similar results;

- late 1800's/early 1900's
- super fast construction
- architect credited with an enormous body of work/lots of amazing buildings, often very young
- all same/similar styles/patterns/symbols
- ZERO (or shady) mid-construction photos
- stories of tunnels, or usage that doesn't make sense





Luigi I'm just being an ass here in this thread but only because I'd really like your thoughts on it.
Thanks dude