I've been taking Vitamin D for about nine months now. I really hope you guys are too. Please do my friends.
Dr. Ryan Cole Blows The Whole COVID-19 Propaganda Away
video link: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/04/no_ ... anda-away/
Cliff notes
Dr. Ryan Cole is the CEO and Medical Director of Cole Diagnostics, one of the largest independent labs in the State of Idaho. Dr. Cole has conducted over 100,000 Covid-19 lab tests and treated over 350,000 patients over his medical career.
Coronavirus infections are seasonal
Average COVID-19 age of death 78.6 years. Average annual US age of death historically 78.6 years.
Face mask wearing outdoors is absolute insanity. No study shows any super-spreader event outdoors. The best mask of all is your immune system.
There is no such thing as cold and flu season. There is only low vitamin D season.
Inflammatory (cytokine) storm cannot be controlled without adequate vitamin D levels.
Massive numbers of Americans have low vitamin D levels.
96% of ICU patients are vitamin D deficient
You cannot synthesize vitamin D from sunlight during fall and winter at 35-degrees north.
You living in northern climates you are immune suppressed if you do not supplement with vitamin D during fall and winter.
Scandinavian countries (Finland, Norway, Sweden) test their citizens twice a year for vitamin D and fortify 35 foods with vitamin D.
Our population is left vulnerable to any seasonal viral infection without a public health program to promote vitamin D adequacy.
There is not social disparity of care but the fact darker skin pigmentation inhibits sunshine vitamin D synthesis in the skin.
Fauci says he personally takes 8000-9000 units of vitamin D per day but why has this has not become a public health message?
The top three public health messages should be: 1- vitamin D; 2- vitamin D; 3- vitamin D.
By law, the federal government cannot approve a vaccine if there is a proven treatment. That would be Ivermectin.
The government is in bed with a vaccine company; both the federal government and Moderna co-hold patents on their RNA vaccine. The “fox is guarding the henhouse.”
The drug Remdesivir only works during the first 2-3 days of the infection. It does not increase survival. It is like “peeing on a forest fire.”
Four billion doses of Ivermectin have safely taken Ivermectin. Death rate decreased 70-90% in hospitals treating COVID-19 patients.
Of the half million COVID-19 deaths in North America, there would be 375,000 less deaths if Ivermectin were used! Public health officials have blood on their hands. 100% of Ivermectin-treated patients don’t get ill. Works for all genetic variants.
The vaccines are an experiment on society.
The vaccine is unproven and long-term safety data is not even being
You can get Ivermectin from doctors online. Myfreedoctor.com.
Thoughts on coronavirus...
- Megaterio Llamas
- Posts: 4030
- Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 7:56 pm
- Reputation: 2545
Re: Thoughts on coronavirus...
el rey del mambo
Here is a PDF you can download
It was written in 2017 as a 'hypothetical' predictive modelling exercise.
What's weird though is that aside from being a couple years off, it pretty much describes EXACTLY what happened/what is happening.
Please download and read, and tell me if you think its just a coincidence:
https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org ... enario.pdf
It was written in 2017 as a 'hypothetical' predictive modelling exercise.
What's weird though is that aside from being a couple years off, it pretty much describes EXACTLY what happened/what is happening.
Please download and read, and tell me if you think its just a coincidence:
https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org ... enario.pdf
This is really great
A detailed breakdown of the web of corruption/HUGE conflicts of interest behind those most responsible for directing Canada's lockdown response.
All the major players have direct ties and are invested in/receiving money from Big Pharma, Gates Foundation, World Economic Forum, etc.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST at the highest levels showing clear motivation for these individuals to steer this situation along a pre-determined path
PLEASE WATCH:
Creators: K. Wand & W.G. Gervais
Narration / Producer: K. Wand
Audiovisual / Editing / Producer: W.G. Gervais
https://very-opinionated.com/works/trag ... n-ontario/
Written with a team of researchers, contributors & collaborators.
For the most relevant and accurate c19 data, please follow Kelly Brown:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQsQL1 ... je2IBKNVXA
https://twitter.com/rubiconcapital_?s=11
A detailed breakdown of the web of corruption/HUGE conflicts of interest behind those most responsible for directing Canada's lockdown response.
All the major players have direct ties and are invested in/receiving money from Big Pharma, Gates Foundation, World Economic Forum, etc.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST at the highest levels showing clear motivation for these individuals to steer this situation along a pre-determined path
PLEASE WATCH:
Creators: K. Wand & W.G. Gervais
Narration / Producer: K. Wand
Audiovisual / Editing / Producer: W.G. Gervais
https://very-opinionated.com/works/trag ... n-ontario/
Written with a team of researchers, contributors & collaborators.
For the most relevant and accurate c19 data, please follow Kelly Brown:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQsQL1 ... je2IBKNVXA
https://twitter.com/rubiconcapital_?s=11
Austrian Court Rules PCR Test Not Suitable For COVID-19 Diagnosis And That Lockdowns Has No Legal Basis
https://greatgameindia.com/austria-court-pcr-test/
Following the Portuguese, German and Dutch rulings, now the Austrian court has ruled that PCR tests are not suitable for COVID-19 diagnosis and that lockdowns has no legal or scientific basis.
The Vienna Administrative Court granted a complaint by the FPÖ against the prohibition of its meeting registered for January 31 in Vienna.
“The prohibition was wrong,” the court said says in the ruling (read judgement below).
The court stated on the basis of scientific studies that the grounds for the prohibition put forward by the Vienna State Police Department are completely unfounded.
The court agrees with the statements in the complaint “on all points” and even goes far beyond the arguments put forward by the FPÖ itself.
It is expressly pointed out that, even according to the World Health Organization (which took a u-turn only after Biden took office), “a PCR test is not suitable for diagnosis and therefore does not in itself say anything about the disease or infection of a person”.
“However, the Minister of Health uses a completely different, much broader case definition for Covid-19 diagnosis, which cannot be used to justify the prohibition of a meeting.”
The court came to the conclusion that the “information” from the Vienna City Health Service, on which the prohibition by the Vienna State Police Department was based, “did not contain any valid and evidence-based statements or findings on the pandemic”.
Based on the definitions of the Minister of Health, “Case definition Covid-19” from December 23, 2020, a “confirmed case”:
1 - is any person with evidence of SARS-CoV-2-specific nucleic acid (PCR test), regardless of clinical manifestation or
2 - any person with evidence of SARS-CoV-specific antigen that meets the clinical criteria or
3 - any person with evidence of SARS-CoV-specific antigen that meets the epidemiological criteria.
Thus none of the three “confirmed cases” defined by the Minister of Health meets the requirements of the WHO concept of “sick / infected person”. The WHO refuses to rely solely on the PCR test (confirmed case 1).
In a similar ruling, a Portuguese appeals court has ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test.
A German court in a landmark ruling has declared that COVID-19 lockdowns imposed by the government are unconstitutional.
Thuringia’s spring lockdown was a “catastrophically wrong political decision with dramatic consequences for almost all areas of people’s lives,” the court said, justifying its decision.
https://greatgameindia.com/portuguese-c ... nreliable/
https://greatgameindia.com/german-court ... itutional/
https://greatgameindia.com/austria-court-pcr-test/
Following the Portuguese, German and Dutch rulings, now the Austrian court has ruled that PCR tests are not suitable for COVID-19 diagnosis and that lockdowns has no legal or scientific basis.
The Vienna Administrative Court granted a complaint by the FPÖ against the prohibition of its meeting registered for January 31 in Vienna.
“The prohibition was wrong,” the court said says in the ruling (read judgement below).
The court stated on the basis of scientific studies that the grounds for the prohibition put forward by the Vienna State Police Department are completely unfounded.
The court agrees with the statements in the complaint “on all points” and even goes far beyond the arguments put forward by the FPÖ itself.
It is expressly pointed out that, even according to the World Health Organization (which took a u-turn only after Biden took office), “a PCR test is not suitable for diagnosis and therefore does not in itself say anything about the disease or infection of a person”.
“However, the Minister of Health uses a completely different, much broader case definition for Covid-19 diagnosis, which cannot be used to justify the prohibition of a meeting.”
The court came to the conclusion that the “information” from the Vienna City Health Service, on which the prohibition by the Vienna State Police Department was based, “did not contain any valid and evidence-based statements or findings on the pandemic”.
Based on the definitions of the Minister of Health, “Case definition Covid-19” from December 23, 2020, a “confirmed case”:
1 - is any person with evidence of SARS-CoV-2-specific nucleic acid (PCR test), regardless of clinical manifestation or
2 - any person with evidence of SARS-CoV-specific antigen that meets the clinical criteria or
3 - any person with evidence of SARS-CoV-specific antigen that meets the epidemiological criteria.
Thus none of the three “confirmed cases” defined by the Minister of Health meets the requirements of the WHO concept of “sick / infected person”. The WHO refuses to rely solely on the PCR test (confirmed case 1).
In a similar ruling, a Portuguese appeals court has ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test.
A German court in a landmark ruling has declared that COVID-19 lockdowns imposed by the government are unconstitutional.
Thuringia’s spring lockdown was a “catastrophically wrong political decision with dramatic consequences for almost all areas of people’s lives,” the court said, justifying its decision.
https://greatgameindia.com/portuguese-c ... nreliable/
https://greatgameindia.com/german-court ... itutional/
Listen to this talk
Those skeptical of the vaccine and vaccine passports are openly called 'fruit loops', 'nutcases', and people who 'haven't read deeply into it'
Calls for 'No Jab, No Job', and open Censorship of opinion - everyone nods their heads
Those skeptical of the vaccine and vaccine passports are openly called 'fruit loops', 'nutcases', and people who 'haven't read deeply into it'
Calls for 'No Jab, No Job', and open Censorship of opinion - everyone nods their heads