Bill Gates and Ghislaine/Maxwell sisters have been working together since AT LEAST 1995
Here is a TV spot featuring Bill Gates talking about his new 1995 internet browser/search engine MAGELLAN. Magellan was owned by Ghislaine Maxwell's sisters, both featured in the video. It may have been the first major search engine system/the google of the day
Part of McKinley Group
In the video they boast about how Magellan has access to the WHOLE of the internet ('not just the world wide web', says Maxwell with a smirk), and filters your search results.
GET THIS:
@ 3:40 of the video, she gives a demonstration of how it works. She says you type in a few search words, and Magellan will give you the best results.
Then she appears to come up with a random topic for search words, and chooses;
KIDS AND FUN
She hits the search button shows the results; all harmless sites about kids games etc.
**I seriously suspect that at the time, elites already knew what Maxwells (and their father) were doing, and this was a signal to them that they would protect their content. In fact I think Magellan may have been created specifically to encrypt and protect their secrets
VID DOES NOT ALLOW EMBEDS, please watch on YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_JeI2-lFgM
PedoGate
- Canuckster
- Posts: 6742
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 5:24 pm
- Reputation: 3081
Kids and fun considering the situation kind of makes it a bit creepy doesn't it
People say they all want the truth, but when they are confronted with a truth that disagrees with them, they balk at it as if it were an unwanted zombie apocalypse come to destroy civilization.
This channel is amazing:
GOOD LAWGIC
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKzav7 ... _PEJ5HvyTw
I am listening to the most recent vid on the Maxwell trial now, was hooked all day yesterday while working.
He is an actual lawyer, who is ACTUALLY THERE EVERY DAY reporting and taking notes.
According to him there are maximum 150 people TOTAL who are actually witnessing this trial. Less than 40-50 in the actual room at a time, most journalists like himself are in separate rooms watching livestream. He insists the transcripts do not tell the whole story and that seeing it live is a very different context. Yet so few will be able to properly report on such an important trial
According to him he is the only lawyer present amongst the journalists, and so he has a lot of interesting comments on things happening in the court that most of the other journalists don't pick up on. He says they chat and compare notes all the time, super interesting.
He gives a brief update at the actual courthouse each day, then comes home to do longer vids going through all the notes in detail.
His angle is from a lawyer's perspective, before this he covered other interesting NYC cases from the interest of lawyer stuff.
This is super interesting because he is NOT from a conspiracy or political background. What's super interesting is that at the beginning of his coverage he admits he doesn't really care about the case, has no interest and is just covering it because its a popular case amongst his subscribers and he wants to keep his YouTube channel growing. He admits this freely.
But then about 3/4 of the way in he starts to have a turn, he starts to get upset and gets personal about it, even cries a bit in some vids talking about it. Develops a real hatred for Epstein and Maxwell and then starts considering all their company from Active Presidents to Royalty etc etc
The case is not over, a few more days to go. I'm up to day 8.
From his perspective the Prosecution seems to be winning without too much trouble. A few losses but overall it looks very clear what Maxwell was doing. Hopefully there are still some big shots to be fired before its over
GOOD LAWGIC
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKzav7 ... _PEJ5HvyTw
I am listening to the most recent vid on the Maxwell trial now, was hooked all day yesterday while working.
He is an actual lawyer, who is ACTUALLY THERE EVERY DAY reporting and taking notes.
According to him there are maximum 150 people TOTAL who are actually witnessing this trial. Less than 40-50 in the actual room at a time, most journalists like himself are in separate rooms watching livestream. He insists the transcripts do not tell the whole story and that seeing it live is a very different context. Yet so few will be able to properly report on such an important trial
According to him he is the only lawyer present amongst the journalists, and so he has a lot of interesting comments on things happening in the court that most of the other journalists don't pick up on. He says they chat and compare notes all the time, super interesting.
He gives a brief update at the actual courthouse each day, then comes home to do longer vids going through all the notes in detail.
His angle is from a lawyer's perspective, before this he covered other interesting NYC cases from the interest of lawyer stuff.
This is super interesting because he is NOT from a conspiracy or political background. What's super interesting is that at the beginning of his coverage he admits he doesn't really care about the case, has no interest and is just covering it because its a popular case amongst his subscribers and he wants to keep his YouTube channel growing. He admits this freely.
But then about 3/4 of the way in he starts to have a turn, he starts to get upset and gets personal about it, even cries a bit in some vids talking about it. Develops a real hatred for Epstein and Maxwell and then starts considering all their company from Active Presidents to Royalty etc etc
The case is not over, a few more days to go. I'm up to day 8.
From his perspective the Prosecution seems to be winning without too much trouble. A few losses but overall it looks very clear what Maxwell was doing. Hopefully there are still some big shots to be fired before its over
Canuckster wrote:Kids and fun considering the situation kind of makes it a bit creepy doesn't it
Maxwell's father was already running sexual blackmail operations before 1995.
That network existed actively as did Maxwell's role in Mossad etc as that TV spot was being filmed.
When the Maxwell sisters went on that TV bit to promote Magellan you can be sure that many interested parties were interested to see what was happening. This was a nod to her clients and associates I am sure.
There is another segment with the other sister sitting at a desk in front of a computer demonstrating Magellan. The shot opens with a clear foreground element with a variety of FLAGS in it. Then the camera zooms in on Maxwell and begins the segment. Could this also be some sort of signal? Normally I could chalk that up to nothing significant but these are Maxwell family FFS I think its always interesting to watch for symbolism where this ilk of people are making public appearances
These people already in 1995 had ties/control of many of the most powerful people in the world, their father was a fuckin gangster and pedo blackmail was at the forefront of his operations. Maxwell sisters knew it. Bill Gates knew it.
lol found this today:
Re; the Maxwell Trial
Many things are suspect in the case, it seems like just a very narrow case specifically about Ghislaine about specific crimes, with only a handful of specific victims all with damaged credibility etc Also the judge looks like a trans person, whatever that's worth to you
They could very well put Ghislaine away with a light sentence and use it to shut up the issue...
OR
perhaps if they could in fact convict Ghislaine of these crimes, perhaps this might open the door to start investigating further?
If they do find her guilty, it really does sort of imply that the rest of her network and all her major clients needs to totally be investigated ASAP including Clintons, Royals, Gates etc etc etc - basically they all become sudden suspects in child sex crimes
History tells me it will be the former, but I still have some hope its the latter.
Many things are suspect in the case, it seems like just a very narrow case specifically about Ghislaine about specific crimes, with only a handful of specific victims all with damaged credibility etc Also the judge looks like a trans person, whatever that's worth to you
They could very well put Ghislaine away with a light sentence and use it to shut up the issue...
OR
perhaps if they could in fact convict Ghislaine of these crimes, perhaps this might open the door to start investigating further?
If they do find her guilty, it really does sort of imply that the rest of her network and all her major clients needs to totally be investigated ASAP including Clintons, Royals, Gates etc etc etc - basically they all become sudden suspects in child sex crimes
History tells me it will be the former, but I still have some hope its the latter.
Here is GOOD LAWGIC outside the courthouse, discussing his interaction with Maxwell's defence lawyer
He suggested to keep pressing to release the bigger names in the flight logs, and why they weren't pushing that anymore
He suggested to keep pressing to release the bigger names in the flight logs, and why they weren't pushing that anymore