Mandatory global vaccine 'the only solution', says Fauci - who has a direct financial interest/investment in such a global vaccine.
LOL
Thoughts on coronavirus...
He has to overcome a bout of duper's delight at the start of the interview... the camera even cuts away at 15 seconds in to focus on the interviewer, who isn't even close to saying anything.
He never fully succeeds at hiding his smirk but he does eventually kind of get it under control. You can tell he was trying really hard.
Steve Jobs is rolling over in his grave.
Document from the ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION in 2010
SCENARIO for the FUTURE of TECHNOLOGY and INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Predicts a DESIRABLE scenario that eerily matches what we are seeing.
If you don't understand the history of the Rockefellers, you seriously need to do your homework. These guys have been cultivating evil for over 100 years, at the crux of the Oil Industry, Central Banking, both World Wars, the entire western medical/pharma industry, the United Nations, World Health Organization, control of media, and overall putting nearly ALL the pieces in place for an openly admitted agenda for World Government.
This is a FACT, no opinion nor speculation. Mountains of clear evidence for this, its just avoided in the press (wonder why) so, brutally, most people are unaware of the realities of what that name means
link to full document:
https://archive.org/details/pdfy-tNG7Mj ... b/mode/2up
One scenarios in the document is 'LOCK STEP':
Its weird because its written in past tense, as though it were from the future or something lol
As a result there are numerous 'predictions' made... mor example if Nigeria overthrows their government in 2026 I will not be surprised, lol:
Notice the use of the term 'Climate Change' in 2010:
SCENARIO for the FUTURE of TECHNOLOGY and INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Predicts a DESIRABLE scenario that eerily matches what we are seeing.
If you don't understand the history of the Rockefellers, you seriously need to do your homework. These guys have been cultivating evil for over 100 years, at the crux of the Oil Industry, Central Banking, both World Wars, the entire western medical/pharma industry, the United Nations, World Health Organization, control of media, and overall putting nearly ALL the pieces in place for an openly admitted agenda for World Government.
This is a FACT, no opinion nor speculation. Mountains of clear evidence for this, its just avoided in the press (wonder why) so, brutally, most people are unaware of the realities of what that name means
link to full document:
https://archive.org/details/pdfy-tNG7Mj ... b/mode/2up
One scenarios in the document is 'LOCK STEP':
Its weird because its written in past tense, as though it were from the future or something lol
As a result there are numerous 'predictions' made... mor example if Nigeria overthrows their government in 2026 I will not be surprised, lol:
Notice the use of the term 'Climate Change' in 2010:
-
Megaterio Llamas
- Posts: 4508
- Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 7:56 pm
- Reputation: 2674
Public Health, COVID-19 and Recovery
https://ahtribune.com/world/covid-19/40 ... overy.html
4. Lessons
"There is also the question of culture and broader social cohesion. It has been suggested that eastern countries like South Korea and China have done better because of the “deep divisions and poor leadership in the west”, and that “the trust that citizens must have in governments is low in the west and that has hurt its ability to mobilize people in a time of grave peril” (Chaulia 2020). The cynical reactions to the erratic behavior of the UK and US leaders lend some support to this claim. The western stereotype is often that “authoritarian” systems fail from suppressing information and communications (Gebrekidan 2020). But the suggested authoritarian-liberal dichotomy is a false one, because the late entry of the US and UK to quarantine restrictions was accompanied by severe policing, severe penalties, the use of police drone surveillance and the domestic deployment of armed forces (Castle 2020; Haynes 2020; Browne 2020). All public health systems are paternalistic, or maternalistic, but the use of armed forces due to incapacity in the public health system is a serious failing.
There are important lessons from China, as from principles drawn from past epidemic management, and the crisis has exposed weaknesses in the US and UK systems. The social mobilization in Wuhan, organized by local authorities and backed by the central government, certainly helped early recovery from what could have been an even more devastating epidemic (Leung, Wu, Liu and Leung 2020). Other countries cannot copy that experience, but they can observe and draw lessons (CGTN 2020).
Early restrictive and quarantine measures were in principle justified, but by international law they should be ‘proportionate’ to the particular threat posed and employing the ‘least restrictive’ measures possible. Public health logic accepts that restrictions on movement and association should be relaxed as the infection rates abate, in coordination with an epidemiological vigilance to ensure that a second wave of infections does not arise (Leung, Wu, Liu and Leung 2020; EurekAlert 2020). Time frames should reassure populations that there is some end in sight to restrictive measures, and that relaxation can begin even before vaccines are available, when the disease is controlled.
It seems likely that greater experimentation with the use of anti-viral and immunotherapy drugs helped treatment in China, but this was impeded in the USA, where strong patent laws and corporate management make the newer forms of such drugs expensive. There is now strong competition to produce the first vaccine, and for that reason level some availability seems likely within two months. However, we can expect to see a war of words between the companies involved, over questions of safety and efficacy.
Overall, countries such as the US and the UK, which had weak or run down public health systems, failed their own peoples by predictable deficits in preparedness, health workforces, protective equipment, preventive capacity, early detection and swift responses. When they did respond they tended to draw on security forces in lieu of an effective health workforce. Death rates were far higher than average and recovery may take longer. In the case of the US, the deficit is compounded by serious infection in the 150 military bases at home and the 800 US military bases abroad. Those pose a risk to the US population and to the many host countries. China and South Korea did better through their universal health cover, greater investment in health systems and greater commitment to health crisis planning."
https://ahtribune.com/world/covid-19/40 ... overy.html
4. Lessons
"There is also the question of culture and broader social cohesion. It has been suggested that eastern countries like South Korea and China have done better because of the “deep divisions and poor leadership in the west”, and that “the trust that citizens must have in governments is low in the west and that has hurt its ability to mobilize people in a time of grave peril” (Chaulia 2020). The cynical reactions to the erratic behavior of the UK and US leaders lend some support to this claim. The western stereotype is often that “authoritarian” systems fail from suppressing information and communications (Gebrekidan 2020). But the suggested authoritarian-liberal dichotomy is a false one, because the late entry of the US and UK to quarantine restrictions was accompanied by severe policing, severe penalties, the use of police drone surveillance and the domestic deployment of armed forces (Castle 2020; Haynes 2020; Browne 2020). All public health systems are paternalistic, or maternalistic, but the use of armed forces due to incapacity in the public health system is a serious failing.
There are important lessons from China, as from principles drawn from past epidemic management, and the crisis has exposed weaknesses in the US and UK systems. The social mobilization in Wuhan, organized by local authorities and backed by the central government, certainly helped early recovery from what could have been an even more devastating epidemic (Leung, Wu, Liu and Leung 2020). Other countries cannot copy that experience, but they can observe and draw lessons (CGTN 2020).
Early restrictive and quarantine measures were in principle justified, but by international law they should be ‘proportionate’ to the particular threat posed and employing the ‘least restrictive’ measures possible. Public health logic accepts that restrictions on movement and association should be relaxed as the infection rates abate, in coordination with an epidemiological vigilance to ensure that a second wave of infections does not arise (Leung, Wu, Liu and Leung 2020; EurekAlert 2020). Time frames should reassure populations that there is some end in sight to restrictive measures, and that relaxation can begin even before vaccines are available, when the disease is controlled.
It seems likely that greater experimentation with the use of anti-viral and immunotherapy drugs helped treatment in China, but this was impeded in the USA, where strong patent laws and corporate management make the newer forms of such drugs expensive. There is now strong competition to produce the first vaccine, and for that reason level some availability seems likely within two months. However, we can expect to see a war of words between the companies involved, over questions of safety and efficacy.
Overall, countries such as the US and the UK, which had weak or run down public health systems, failed their own peoples by predictable deficits in preparedness, health workforces, protective equipment, preventive capacity, early detection and swift responses. When they did respond they tended to draw on security forces in lieu of an effective health workforce. Death rates were far higher than average and recovery may take longer. In the case of the US, the deficit is compounded by serious infection in the 150 military bases at home and the 800 US military bases abroad. Those pose a risk to the US population and to the many host countries. China and South Korea did better through their universal health cover, greater investment in health systems and greater commitment to health crisis planning."
el rey del mambo
Message to Canadians Concerned About Government Overreach
https://vaccinechoicecanada.com/in-the- ... RMdI-I3upI
The World Health Organization, our Federal, Provincial and Municipal governments, chief medical officers, and the mainstream media would have us believe that we are facing the biggest threat to humanity in our lifetime. Predictions of wide-spread infection with high rates of mortality persuaded governments that unprecedented containment measures were necessary to save us from certain peril.
While there is much about this season’s coronavirus that is yet to be understood, what the emerging evidence clearly demonstrates is that the majority of the population is not at serious risk of complications or mortality, and that the mathematical modeling used to justify these extreme containment measures is proving invalid.
Further, the drastic isolation measures that have been introduced by our governments for an undetermined period of time are not supported by scientific evidence, nor do they have the consensus agreement of the scientific community. There is much severe and valid criticism from recognized experts who dispute the governments’ position and response to COVID 19.
There is reason for Canadians to be concerned that an over-hyped COVID 19 pandemic narrative is being utilized to create panic and to justify the systemic violation of the rights and freedoms that form the basis of our society, including our constitutional rights, sovereignty, privacy, rule of law, financial security, and even our very democracy.
Vaccine Choice Canada has sought a legal opinion on our government’s actions, and it is clear that significant violations of our rights and freedoms are being perpetrated by our governments, health authorities, and policing bodies.
Basis for Concern:
-There is no scientific evidence to substantiate the effectiveness of “social distancing” as a medical intervention to reduce COVID 19 transmission and infection.
-The imposition of mass and indiscriminate self-isolation measures prevents the development of natural immunity necessary to secure herd immunity.
-It is the opinion of experts that efforts to suppress the virus through self-isolation measures prolongs the outbreak and puts more lives at risk, damages our economy and the mental stability and health of the more vulnerable.
-The number of deaths attributed to COVID 19 is unreliable given the inclusion of “presumptive” deaths and the failure of the medical system to differentiate between individuals dying from COVID 19 and those with co-morbidities dying with COVID 19.
-This failure inflates the risk of mortality from COVID 19 and undermines confidence in any actions based on mortality statistics.
-The presentation of the mortality data, expressed as a percentage of deaths of tested and confirmed cases, is distorting the data and creating undue fear. This data fails to include those who contracted the virus but were not tested nor confirmed and who recovered without medical intervention.
-The number of reported deaths attributed to COVID 19 is not out of “normal” range when compared to the annual mortality from influenza and pneumonia recorded through the last decade.
-There is no data to indicate that the total excess mortality in Canada has increased substantially from previous years.
-Mortality modeling by the World Health Organization, Imperial College of London, and the US Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation have all been drastically downgraded. Strategies based on these numbers are no longer valid.
-The Canadian government has not been transparent with its data, modeling, or containment exit strategy.
-The use of surveillance technologies to monitor citizens is illegal and a clear violation of our right to privacy.
-The suspension of our civil liberties is not justified by the level of risk posed by COVID 19.
-The suspension of our right to liberty, to travel, and to conduct commerce is not justified by the level of risk posed by COVID 19.
-The suspensions of our rights to participate in community and in commerce is causing substantial and irreparable harm to our economy, livelihoods, communities, and the physical and psychological well-being of Canadians. There is no evidence that these harms are being considered in the modeling.
-The closure of our courts of law is unprecedented, illegal, unconstitutional, undemocratic, unnecessary and impedes the ability of Canadians to hold our governments accountable.
-The closure of our parliaments is unprecedented, illegal, unconstitutional undemocratic, unnecessary, and impedes the ability of Canadians to hold our governments accountable.
-As of this date, the Prime Minister of Canada has not invoked the Emergencies Act. Therefore, emergency measures announced by the Prime Minister and his public statements to Canadians to “just stay home” have no legal basis or authority, are an abuse of power, resulting in confusing and unlawful messaging.
Stand Up and Protect
It is time for Canadians to stand up and protect our rights and freedoms.
It is time for our governments to answer the legitimate concerns and criticisms of experts who do not concur with our governments, nor their position and actions.
It is time for our governments to be transparent as to what “advice” they are receiving and from whom. Our government leaders and public health officers must clearly, openly, and honestly reveal the scientific evidence and data upon which these violations of the rights and freedoms of Canadians are based.
It is time to stand up and demand that government officials immediately cease relying upon distorted non-contextual data that result in policies that evoke fear, dread and panic to Canadian families and businesses.
We are facing a serious threat to the rights and freedoms guaranteed under the Constitution, and the values that make Canada a free and democratic country.
The time to stand up is now.
Vaccine Choice Canada has a long history and enviable reputation of advocating for and defending our rights and freedoms in Canada when it comes to public and individual health.
Canadians who are affected by government measures and wish to support and openly participate in actions to protect our rights and freedoms are invited to join us in our efforts.
Vaccine Choice Canada
https://vaccinechoicecanada.com/wp-cont ... 9-2020.pdf
https://vaccinechoicecanada.com/in-the- ... RMdI-I3upI
The World Health Organization, our Federal, Provincial and Municipal governments, chief medical officers, and the mainstream media would have us believe that we are facing the biggest threat to humanity in our lifetime. Predictions of wide-spread infection with high rates of mortality persuaded governments that unprecedented containment measures were necessary to save us from certain peril.
While there is much about this season’s coronavirus that is yet to be understood, what the emerging evidence clearly demonstrates is that the majority of the population is not at serious risk of complications or mortality, and that the mathematical modeling used to justify these extreme containment measures is proving invalid.
Further, the drastic isolation measures that have been introduced by our governments for an undetermined period of time are not supported by scientific evidence, nor do they have the consensus agreement of the scientific community. There is much severe and valid criticism from recognized experts who dispute the governments’ position and response to COVID 19.
There is reason for Canadians to be concerned that an over-hyped COVID 19 pandemic narrative is being utilized to create panic and to justify the systemic violation of the rights and freedoms that form the basis of our society, including our constitutional rights, sovereignty, privacy, rule of law, financial security, and even our very democracy.
Vaccine Choice Canada has sought a legal opinion on our government’s actions, and it is clear that significant violations of our rights and freedoms are being perpetrated by our governments, health authorities, and policing bodies.
Basis for Concern:
-There is no scientific evidence to substantiate the effectiveness of “social distancing” as a medical intervention to reduce COVID 19 transmission and infection.
-The imposition of mass and indiscriminate self-isolation measures prevents the development of natural immunity necessary to secure herd immunity.
-It is the opinion of experts that efforts to suppress the virus through self-isolation measures prolongs the outbreak and puts more lives at risk, damages our economy and the mental stability and health of the more vulnerable.
-The number of deaths attributed to COVID 19 is unreliable given the inclusion of “presumptive” deaths and the failure of the medical system to differentiate between individuals dying from COVID 19 and those with co-morbidities dying with COVID 19.
-This failure inflates the risk of mortality from COVID 19 and undermines confidence in any actions based on mortality statistics.
-The presentation of the mortality data, expressed as a percentage of deaths of tested and confirmed cases, is distorting the data and creating undue fear. This data fails to include those who contracted the virus but were not tested nor confirmed and who recovered without medical intervention.
-The number of reported deaths attributed to COVID 19 is not out of “normal” range when compared to the annual mortality from influenza and pneumonia recorded through the last decade.
-There is no data to indicate that the total excess mortality in Canada has increased substantially from previous years.
-Mortality modeling by the World Health Organization, Imperial College of London, and the US Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation have all been drastically downgraded. Strategies based on these numbers are no longer valid.
-The Canadian government has not been transparent with its data, modeling, or containment exit strategy.
-The use of surveillance technologies to monitor citizens is illegal and a clear violation of our right to privacy.
-The suspension of our civil liberties is not justified by the level of risk posed by COVID 19.
-The suspension of our right to liberty, to travel, and to conduct commerce is not justified by the level of risk posed by COVID 19.
-The suspensions of our rights to participate in community and in commerce is causing substantial and irreparable harm to our economy, livelihoods, communities, and the physical and psychological well-being of Canadians. There is no evidence that these harms are being considered in the modeling.
-The closure of our courts of law is unprecedented, illegal, unconstitutional, undemocratic, unnecessary and impedes the ability of Canadians to hold our governments accountable.
-The closure of our parliaments is unprecedented, illegal, unconstitutional undemocratic, unnecessary, and impedes the ability of Canadians to hold our governments accountable.
-As of this date, the Prime Minister of Canada has not invoked the Emergencies Act. Therefore, emergency measures announced by the Prime Minister and his public statements to Canadians to “just stay home” have no legal basis or authority, are an abuse of power, resulting in confusing and unlawful messaging.
Stand Up and Protect
It is time for Canadians to stand up and protect our rights and freedoms.
It is time for our governments to answer the legitimate concerns and criticisms of experts who do not concur with our governments, nor their position and actions.
It is time for our governments to be transparent as to what “advice” they are receiving and from whom. Our government leaders and public health officers must clearly, openly, and honestly reveal the scientific evidence and data upon which these violations of the rights and freedoms of Canadians are based.
It is time to stand up and demand that government officials immediately cease relying upon distorted non-contextual data that result in policies that evoke fear, dread and panic to Canadian families and businesses.
We are facing a serious threat to the rights and freedoms guaranteed under the Constitution, and the values that make Canada a free and democratic country.
The time to stand up is now.
Vaccine Choice Canada has a long history and enviable reputation of advocating for and defending our rights and freedoms in Canada when it comes to public and individual health.
Canadians who are affected by government measures and wish to support and openly participate in actions to protect our rights and freedoms are invited to join us in our efforts.
Vaccine Choice Canada
https://vaccinechoicecanada.com/wp-cont ... 9-2020.pdf
-
Megaterio Llamas
- Posts: 4508
- Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 7:56 pm
- Reputation: 2674
I'm just listening to this now. Kennedy has had some very interesting things to say lately...
EXCLUSIVE: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Drops New Bombshell — Bill Gates’ Coronavirus Vaccine Will Pay Out BILLIONS in Profits to Dr. Fauci’s Agency
Share:
https://truepundit.com/exclusive-robert ... is-agency/
"If you are one of the millions of Americans wondering why Dr. Anthony Fauci is vehemently cheerleading and praising a coronavirus vaccine for ALL Americans … Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says follow the money.
Bobby Kennedy Jr. dropped a bombshell on the Thomas Paine Podcast, detailing an apparent agreement between the National Institute of Health (NIH) and the Bill Gates-backed pharmacuetical company that has the best chance at this point of securing lucrative contracts for a national coronavirus vaccine. (Listen at top)
That puts your government in bed with Big Pharma and Gates and could pay as much as 50 percent of the profits to the NIH, the parent agency that employs Dr. Anthony Fauci — who again — is lobbying for the vaccine. Does Fauci get a cut of the bounty too? Or has he already been cut in?
Federal officials are not commenting on Kennedy’s alarming information. But … the NIH is the key player in deciding what vaccines get approved for coronavirus and the NIH and government would profit wildly, as Kennedy said, if the Gates-backed pharma play Moderna Inc. gets the green light. Kennedy slammed both Gates and Fauci on numerous occasions during the exclusive interview with Paine. Gates’ company is already in human trials with the vaccine. Just weeks after the outbreak? Listen at top.
EXCLUSIVE: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Drops New Bombshell — Bill Gates’ Coronavirus Vaccine Will Pay Out BILLIONS in Profits to Dr. Fauci’s Agency
Share:
https://truepundit.com/exclusive-robert ... is-agency/
"If you are one of the millions of Americans wondering why Dr. Anthony Fauci is vehemently cheerleading and praising a coronavirus vaccine for ALL Americans … Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says follow the money.
Bobby Kennedy Jr. dropped a bombshell on the Thomas Paine Podcast, detailing an apparent agreement between the National Institute of Health (NIH) and the Bill Gates-backed pharmacuetical company that has the best chance at this point of securing lucrative contracts for a national coronavirus vaccine. (Listen at top)
That puts your government in bed with Big Pharma and Gates and could pay as much as 50 percent of the profits to the NIH, the parent agency that employs Dr. Anthony Fauci — who again — is lobbying for the vaccine. Does Fauci get a cut of the bounty too? Or has he already been cut in?
Federal officials are not commenting on Kennedy’s alarming information. But … the NIH is the key player in deciding what vaccines get approved for coronavirus and the NIH and government would profit wildly, as Kennedy said, if the Gates-backed pharma play Moderna Inc. gets the green light. Kennedy slammed both Gates and Fauci on numerous occasions during the exclusive interview with Paine. Gates’ company is already in human trials with the vaccine. Just weeks after the outbreak? Listen at top.
el rey del mambo
Wikileaks just dumped a document explaining the scope of influence that Big Pharma has over the WHO:
https://wikileaks.org/wiki/Big_Pharma_i ... EMEYsf2xwk
The compilation of documents shows the influence of “Big Pharma” on the policy making decisions of the WHO, the UN body safeguarding public health. These confidential documents were obtained by the drug industry before their public release to WHO member states. The document also illustrates that the WHO expert group was highly responsive to industry lobbying — a result that public health groups had feared since early 2009, when the expert group met with the industry, but refused to meet with public health groups known to be industry critics. The likely audience for these documents include countries, public health policy makers, civil society, industry, academia, media, patients and the general public.
The relationship between the WHO and pharmaceutical companies isn’t really highlighted in the mainstream at all, and therefore it’s off the radar and not on the minds of the masses. We see the same type of thing when it comes to ‘big pharma’ and its relationship between our federal health regulatory agencies. Despite the fact that these relationships and examples of corruption aren’t highlighted by mainstream media, they are and have been highlighted for many years.
“The medical profession is being bought by the pharmaceutical industry, not only in terms of the practice of medicine, but also in terms of teaching and research. The academic institutions of this country are allowing themselves to be the paid agents of the pharmaceutical industry. I think it’s disgraceful.” – Arnold Seymour Relman (1923-2014), Harvard professor of medicine and former Editor-in-Chief of The New England Medical Journal
"The pharmaceutical companies have been able to purchase congress. They’re the largest lobbying entity in Washington D.C.. They have more lobbyists in Washington D.C. than there are congressman and senators combined. They give twice to congress what the next largest lobbying entity is, which is oil and gas… Imagine the power they exercise over both republicans and democrats. They’ve captured them (our regulatory agencies) and turned them into sock puppets. They’ve compromised the press… and they destroy the publications that publish real science”
- Robert F Kennedy Jr
https://wikileaks.org/wiki/Big_Pharma_i ... EMEYsf2xwk
The compilation of documents shows the influence of “Big Pharma” on the policy making decisions of the WHO, the UN body safeguarding public health. These confidential documents were obtained by the drug industry before their public release to WHO member states. The document also illustrates that the WHO expert group was highly responsive to industry lobbying — a result that public health groups had feared since early 2009, when the expert group met with the industry, but refused to meet with public health groups known to be industry critics. The likely audience for these documents include countries, public health policy makers, civil society, industry, academia, media, patients and the general public.
The relationship between the WHO and pharmaceutical companies isn’t really highlighted in the mainstream at all, and therefore it’s off the radar and not on the minds of the masses. We see the same type of thing when it comes to ‘big pharma’ and its relationship between our federal health regulatory agencies. Despite the fact that these relationships and examples of corruption aren’t highlighted by mainstream media, they are and have been highlighted for many years.
“The medical profession is being bought by the pharmaceutical industry, not only in terms of the practice of medicine, but also in terms of teaching and research. The academic institutions of this country are allowing themselves to be the paid agents of the pharmaceutical industry. I think it’s disgraceful.” – Arnold Seymour Relman (1923-2014), Harvard professor of medicine and former Editor-in-Chief of The New England Medical Journal
"The pharmaceutical companies have been able to purchase congress. They’re the largest lobbying entity in Washington D.C.. They have more lobbyists in Washington D.C. than there are congressman and senators combined. They give twice to congress what the next largest lobbying entity is, which is oil and gas… Imagine the power they exercise over both republicans and democrats. They’ve captured them (our regulatory agencies) and turned them into sock puppets. They’ve compromised the press… and they destroy the publications that publish real science”
- Robert F Kennedy Jr
^^ According to Robert Kennedy Jr, Big Pharma gives TWICE the amount to Congress via lobbying than the next largest lobbying entity, which is Oil & Gas, and 4 TIMES as much as Defence and Aerospace
-
Canuckster
- Posts: 6807
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 5:24 pm
- Reputation: 3108
People say they all want the truth, but when they are confronted with a truth that disagrees with them, they balk at it as if it were an unwanted zombie apocalypse come to destroy civilization.
Return to “The Grand Chessboard”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests