Madam Secretary TV series= Blatent Hillary Conditioning

[Devil's Advocate]

Hollywood has influenced the voters before, they did it with the TV show, 24 (2001-2010)





when they introduced us to a Black President.

There was also a Black President in the movies;


Head Of State (2003)



Idiocracy (2006)



And in 2008 life imitated art when Barack Obama became the President.


At the same time though, we have seen parallel conditioning about a Woman President.

Commander in Chief with Geena Davis (2005-2006)



The series 24, also switched from a Black President to a Woman President in the later seasons.



The latest attempt by Hollywood to condition us to the notion of a woman in power, is the series Madam Secretary with Tea Lonie




This series depicts Leonie's character in the role most recently filled by Hillary Clinton. The show attempts to demonstrate what a strong leader Madam Secretary is, and I have no doubt would help to paint Hillary in a positive light to many people.

The fact that Hollywood are backing Hillary makes me think that she will probably win this election.

[greenseed]

Interesting DA. I fully believe predictive programing exists and has a great effect. Here's a good podcast i listened to a few months ago exploring the subject.

[Masato]

^ thanks guys, great thread.

Was just discussing last night with a friend about how some people are complaining that the new Mad-Max is part of a feminist predictive programming.

He thought it was horseshit, and doesn't see at all that big movies are often not just about money.

I have not seen the film, so I really don't know. I am aware that its easy to become paranoid in seeing propaganda in everything that might even remotely resembles it... but on the other hand this sort of stuff is definitely real as well.

Is it possible to judge real trends in thinking from programmed trends in thinking?

How far ahead are these techniques? For instance is what we are bombarded with today to prepare us for things to come in 1 year? 5 years? 10 years? Could some programming be designed for even more long-term generational goals?

[greenseed]

I had this idea a few years ago that all these zombie movies and shows are to desensitize us to human on 'zombie'(or the sick humans) violence for some coming destabilization. Just like in war the 'government' will demonize and dehumanize their enemies so the public more readily accepts casualties, civilian or not. Imagine a country is demonized as being infected with a crazy virus (Nigeria/ebola?) and that justifies killing EVERYONE there so that the 'zombie virus' wont spread. It's really just a theory and only time will tell if this is a conscious desensitization or just harmless entertainment or somewhere in between.

[greenseed]

^ thanks guys, great thread.

Was just discussing last night with a friend about how some people are complaining that the new Mad-Max is part of a feminist predictive programming.

He thought it was horseshit, and doesn't see at all that big movies are often not just about money.

I have not seen the film, so I really don't know. I am aware that its easy to become paranoid in seeing propaganda in everything that might even remotely resembles it... but on the other hand this sort of stuff is definitely real as well.

Is it possible to judge real trends in thinking from programmed trends in thinking?

How far ahead are these techniques? For instance is what we are bombarded with today to prepare us for things to come in 1 year? 5 years? 10 years? Could some programming be designed for even more long-term generational goals?

Very hard to differentiate organic trends from programmed trends unless you can somehow trace the source of them id say. Obviously we have seen Bernays create trends through his pr techniques: women smoking lucky strikes, kids using proctor & gamble soap, the average working man eating bacon & eggs, fluoridation in water supplies, popularizing green as fashion( also to sell lucky strikes), connecting democracy & capitalism as only working in conjunction with each other @ the 38? Worlds Fair, demonizing Guatemala so United Fruit could regain it's banana plantations there. Etc etc.

These could be seen as shorter term predictive programming techniques i think? The 'elites' who have long, generational plans most likely use planted stories and entertainment to slowly shift public perspective on certain groups or ideas based on their goals. Predictive programming could then be seen as the bread crumbs which led 'us' to these gingerbread houses of the present. The real challenge being recognizing what are the bread crumbs and if 'we' should follow them or make our own path to the beach instead of the witch.

[Masato]

I had this idea a few years ago that all these zombie movies and shows are to desensitize us to human on 'zombie'(or the sick humans) violence for some coming destabilization. Just like in war the 'government' will demonize and dehumanize their enemies so the public more readily accepts casualties, civilian or not. Imagine a country is demonized as being infected with a crazy virus (Nigeria/ebola?) and that justifies killing EVERYONE there so that the 'zombie virus' wont spread. It's really just a theory and only time will tell if this is a conscious desensitization or just harmless entertainment or somewhere in between.

Smart. I've wondered the same thing about the Zombie trend. All of sudden it was EVERYWHERE.

I never thought of disease though... that takes it to another level

My impression was a more general fear and distrust of your neighbor. Like you said, desensitize people to anyone who fits a certain group, even to the point of killing them. It breaks up the harmony of community, and increases the instinct to fear and protect yourself from others.

Then they use broad terms like 'Deniers' etc... lump people into a labelled group and demonize them as sick or ill.

Its basically the opposite of Love, lol