Encyclopedia Britannica = Rockefeller Propaganda

[Masato]

Hey all -

Even I as a child of the computer age grew up knowing the name 'Encyclopedia Britannica'... and unconsciously believed its reputation as a reliable authority and trustworthy source for information.

BUT WHO OWNED IT?? WHO WROTE IT??

WHO decided what would go in, and what would be excluded?
What would be focussed on, and what would be a footnote?
Who will be written of as a hero, and who else a villain?
What would be the chosen 'official' versions of History?
What crimes would remain unknown?
Who's theories would be favoured, and whose would be ignored or ridiculed?
What would be worthy to include in the updated editions?

- Basically... SPIN.


The first Encyclopedia Britannica was published in Scotland around 1770, by a "Society of Gentleman" (apparently 3 dudes).

Here is what the cover page used to look like:


They printed 9 editions before The Rockefeller Syndicate bought it under Standard Oil. (Anyone who is not familiar with Standard Oil/John D Rockefeller needs to do some homework). Then in 1910, it began being printed as 'Encyclopedia Britannica Inc', and began its massive production and distribution into as many American homes and institutions as possible. Obviously, the Rockefellers had near-infinite money to fund such a project, and also near-infinite connections in all sorts of high places from which to insert its 'merits'.

Curiously, there was no 10th Edition - the Rockefellers went straight from 9 to 11
lol


Here was the cover after Bought by Standard Oil (note the 'Inc' at the bottom):



Can you imagine the power they could wield through this on the unconscious minds/beliefs/realities of the entire nation?

What alternative voice could ever compete with such a monster?
("Competition is a sin" - John D Rockefeller)

Apparently, one part of the Rockefeller 're-writes' was a sudden and vicious criticism of Catholicism (the Encyclopedia's editor was Cambridge University - a 'Bastion of the Reformation'), and also anything critical to the practice of vaccination (remember the Rockefellers were also taking over the medical schools/industry at this time).

No doubt they were using the establishment of such an authority for 'truth' and 'facts' (the first 'mainstream media?) to begin their steering of the people towards a purely allopathic, capitalistic, atheistic, anglo-centered, gnostic, luciferian, zionist, and consumerist mindset well over a 100 years ago.

Those sneaky buggers! lol

http://www.reformation.org/britannica.html

[Luigi]

I lol'd at your 9/11 joke Masato :)

[Masato]

^ might not be a joke.

These people use numerology EVERYWHERE once you start looking into it.

[Masato]

recently heard an interview with someone saying the SMITHSONIAN is/was also a similar control institution, and not the beacon of truth & science its advertised as.

Apparently whenever something of interest is/was discovered, it was proper protocol to send it first right away to the smithsonian. Or, have smithsonian reps come as first eyes on site, etc.

They alone could choose to publish it, or vault it/cover it up. MUCH supposedly got buried/ anything that conflicted with the 'official' view of the world/history etc.

[Flying Eye Angle]

Ha ha, internet came along and f'd em up. Now we have the super companies trying to leach their hold onto the net with net neutrality or whatever other pr name they come up with. Who knows how many generations the controlling goes back

[greenseed]

very interesting. I'm in the middle of reading this book: http://www.amazon.ca/Memoirs-David-Rockefeller/dp/0812969731

and their are a ton of interesting facts and connections in terms of Rockefeller funding of institutions of social & financial control. I may make a thread on it.

here's one tidbit on CBS columbia broadcasting systems

[Masato]

Ha ha, internet came along and f'd em up. Now we have the super companies trying to leach their hold onto the net with net neutrality or whatever other pr name they come up with. Who knows how many generations the controlling goes back

Yeah internete did fuck it up but I think we'd be foolish to think they just gave up lol

There is so much disinfo mixed up with truth now it is nearly impossible to discern what's what. Huxley prophecized this in Brave New World, saying the truth would not HAVE to be suppressed because there was so much other info and distraction it didn't matter.

I also think Lenin's quote of; 'If you want to control your opposition, you must lead it yourself' is really fitting for today's times. Watch for big names who get adored by the mainstream media and soak up all the attention while never touching on the issues you wish to keep silent. Koch Brothers agreeing to be the fall guy for anti-global warming critics, Snowden/Assange as the darlings of Whistleblowing, Chomsky etc

I personally have great suspicions of these sort of names

[Masato]

ttt

[IDL]

recently heard an interview with someone saying the SMITHSONIAN is/was also a similar control institution, and not the beacon of truth & science its advertised as.

Apparently whenever something of interest is/was discovered, it was proper protocol to send it first right away to the smithsonian. Or, have smithsonian reps come as first eyes on site, etc.

They alone could choose to publish it, or vault it/cover it up. MUCH supposedly got buried/ anything that conflicted with the 'official' view of the world/history etc.

I've heard the same sort of view of the patent system. That it's set up to manage what gets released to the public and what get's suppressed, among other things. I'm sure there is some truth to that.

[Masato]

^ If you really want to take over/control the world, it is only logical that you would want to control as many institutions as possible.

That's just logical... if you DON'T control key aspects of society, people will fuck up your plans and run in directions contrary to your vision.

As John D Rockefeller is quoted to have said, 'competition is a sin'.