Important CT terms Hijacked by Capitalist/Pop Culture

Politics, History, & 'Conspiracy'
User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 19313
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 8588

Important CT terms Hijacked by Capitalist/Pop Culture

Postby Masato » Tue Jan 06, 2015 4:40 pm

Devil's Advocate wrote:
Masato wrote:It wasn't a Nightmare on Maple st!



So, an Elm tree has some sort of CT relevance?


Elm St was the name of the street Kennedy was killed on.

User avatar
Devil's Advocate
Posts: 314
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2014 6:52 am
Reputation: 531

Postby Devil's Advocate » Tue Jan 06, 2015 7:24 pm

OK, now I get the Elm street thing.

Michael Moore's Farenheit 9/11 was one of the first shows to allege that something was amiss with 9/11. He didn't really hijack the 9/11 thing, he was at the front of it, the only thing was that as a devout liberal, he blamed the republicans for negligence due to greed and serving other interests, rather than looking at the bigger picture.

User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 19313
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 8588

Postby Masato » Tue Jan 06, 2015 10:33 pm

I thought Michael Moore was sort of used as a controlled opposition thing, personally. He gets the star treatment while other whistleblowers getting whacked.

Moore sent all his viewers barking up the wrong trees.

User avatar
Devil's Advocate
Posts: 314
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2014 6:52 am
Reputation: 531

Postby Devil's Advocate » Wed Jan 07, 2015 12:49 am

I gotta disagree with you there. Moore largely plagiarized a British journo named Greg Palast, and ALL of the info in Fareheit 9/11 was accurate. Moore focused on the corruption of the Bush family, and their conflict of interests when it came to the Saudis and 9/11. It wasn''t disinfo, or incorrect, and everything he said was provable. If he'd gone down the road of saying it was an inside job, he wouldnt have been able to back it up.

He is treated like a King by LIBERALS, so of course he gets treated well for representing only one aspect of the false paradigm.

User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 19313
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 8588

Postby Masato » Wed Jan 07, 2015 11:02 am

^ good post

Moore confuses me. If he is controlled opposition I would guess he doesn't know it. Most of his films I've seen seem quite passionate and well made... it just bugs me that the most celebrated CTer in the US rarely gets any deeper than surface CTs. He keeps everything sterile and watered-down.

If Moore made a REAL CT film one day I doubt he'd have the same publicity

Him and Chomsky should go fuck each other (behind closed doors, obviously)


Return to “The Grand Chessboard”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests