i'm laughing right now @ all the libtards who were praising Sweden and the nordic nations when i was in college.
"look how progressive they are they have so many females in the government! ugh we are so backward i can't even!"
yeah you're going to miss all those females when they go under the burka and are locked at home.
silly bitches.
Women are stupid as f***
-
Turanian Trashtalker
- Posts: 802
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2015 4:57 am
- Reputation: 286
-
Turanian Trashtalker
- Posts: 802
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2015 4:57 am
- Reputation: 286
south korea's first female prez is the WORST we've ever had throughout history
what kind of a bitch goes missing for seven hours during the worst emergency of her administration? kids were drowning to death and nobody knew where she was. NOBODY.
five fucking prime ministers, and she couldn't get one approved. the economy is a mess. the press is a mess. the stock market is a mess. she is not her father's daughter, for sure.
you know i wouldn't be so hard on feminism, if females didn't prove these stereotypes to be true every single day.
...
what kind of a bitch goes missing for seven hours during the worst emergency of her administration? kids were drowning to death and nobody knew where she was. NOBODY.
five fucking prime ministers, and she couldn't get one approved. the economy is a mess. the press is a mess. the stock market is a mess. she is not her father's daughter, for sure.
you know i wouldn't be so hard on feminism, if females didn't prove these stereotypes to be true every single day.
...
-
Vutulaki-san
They got bigger problems than feminism. TBD.
"Korea’s Criminal Code section 307 defines criminal defamation as: damaging a person’s reputation by publicly displaying facts. At the basic level, criminal defamation is punishable by up to two years in prison or 5 million won ($4,500) in fines. The penalties increase if the displayed facts are false, and/or if the defendant used newspaper, magazine, radio, the Internet or other publication to display such facts. In addition, it is possible to criminally defame the dead—as long as one does so by publicly displaying false facts.
In practice, a criminal defamation case is usually determined by the answers to the following three questions: (1) whether the displayed fact was truly defamatory; (2) whether the fact was indeed displayed publicly, and; (3) whether the fact was displayed to advance the public interest.
On the first question, to satisfy the criminal defamation law, the displayed fact should be sufficiently specific to actually damage the subject’s social reputation. Accordingly, the Supreme Court of Korea has held that calling someone a “one-eyed cripple” was not defamatory, even though the recipient of the insult indeed had only one eye, because the statement was a generalized insult rather than a specific fact that actually damages the social reputation of the one-eyed person.
For the second question, known as the “publicity” element, the answer depends on whether the factual statement was made such that it was available to the unspecified, general public. Therefore, Korean courts have held that simply badmouthing a third person to a friend, or complaining about a work colleague’s performance to the boss, does not constitute criminal defamation because statements made in such circumstances are not available to the general public.
Finally, the criminal code specifically exempts any fact that may be considered defamatory, as long as it is a true fact presented solely in the service of public purpose. The majority of high-profile criminal defamation cases against the Korean media fail at this stage, because the courts have held that a fact presented to advance the formation of public opinion or debate regarding a public issue is not considered defamatory.
For example, the Seoul Central District Court has held that the creators of a news program that reported on speculative materials regarding the safety of U.S. beef in 2008, sparking a nationwide protest, were not guilty of criminal defamation even though the program presented facts that had several deviations from the truth."
http://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-KRTB-7090
"Korea’s Criminal Code section 307 defines criminal defamation as: damaging a person’s reputation by publicly displaying facts. At the basic level, criminal defamation is punishable by up to two years in prison or 5 million won ($4,500) in fines. The penalties increase if the displayed facts are false, and/or if the defendant used newspaper, magazine, radio, the Internet or other publication to display such facts. In addition, it is possible to criminally defame the dead—as long as one does so by publicly displaying false facts.
In practice, a criminal defamation case is usually determined by the answers to the following three questions: (1) whether the displayed fact was truly defamatory; (2) whether the fact was indeed displayed publicly, and; (3) whether the fact was displayed to advance the public interest.
On the first question, to satisfy the criminal defamation law, the displayed fact should be sufficiently specific to actually damage the subject’s social reputation. Accordingly, the Supreme Court of Korea has held that calling someone a “one-eyed cripple” was not defamatory, even though the recipient of the insult indeed had only one eye, because the statement was a generalized insult rather than a specific fact that actually damages the social reputation of the one-eyed person.
For the second question, known as the “publicity” element, the answer depends on whether the factual statement was made such that it was available to the unspecified, general public. Therefore, Korean courts have held that simply badmouthing a third person to a friend, or complaining about a work colleague’s performance to the boss, does not constitute criminal defamation because statements made in such circumstances are not available to the general public.
Finally, the criminal code specifically exempts any fact that may be considered defamatory, as long as it is a true fact presented solely in the service of public purpose. The majority of high-profile criminal defamation cases against the Korean media fail at this stage, because the courts have held that a fact presented to advance the formation of public opinion or debate regarding a public issue is not considered defamatory.
For example, the Seoul Central District Court has held that the creators of a news program that reported on speculative materials regarding the safety of U.S. beef in 2008, sparking a nationwide protest, were not guilty of criminal defamation even though the program presented facts that had several deviations from the truth."
http://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-KRTB-7090
-
Turanian Trashtalker
- Posts: 802
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2015 4:57 am
- Reputation: 286
hey, guess what female is abusing that law to put journalists in jail.
god i hate that kunt so much.
...
god i hate that kunt so much.
...
-
Vutulaki-san
Most koreans I know think its funny you have to refer to as "chicken". They dont seem to grasp what dangerous territory we are in when the prez tries silencing the press.
Besides where the fuck was she for those 7 hours? The citizens deserve to know.
PS most koreans I talk to these days are gaedoks. What's koreas netizens saying? Well what did they say when it broke?
Besides where the fuck was she for those 7 hours? The citizens deserve to know.
PS most koreans I talk to these days are gaedoks. What's koreas netizens saying? Well what did they say when it broke?
-
Vutulaki-san
Id love to see Australian politicians try to pull that shit lol
Actually they do bit not that blatantly. Fucking jesus
Actually they do bit not that blatantly. Fucking jesus
-
Turanian Trashtalker
- Posts: 802
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2015 4:57 am
- Reputation: 286
go to koreabang dot com. best site i've seen that's on the radar for current events... although some of the translations are off.
the only people who defend her now are conservatives and gaedoks. and they only do it because they think the left wing is worse.
...
the only people who defend her now are conservatives and gaedoks. and they only do it because they think the left wing is worse.
...
-
Professor Diet Butcher
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 9:31 am
- Reputation: 2207
Turanian Trashtalker wrote:I forgot to mention that this bish is Canadian minister of trade in Justin Trudeau's cabinet.
LOL @ affirmative action
LOL @ gay Canada.
Cuckdeau made it a point to hire 50% women, regardless of their qualifications. You are really going to miss Stephen Harper during the next couple of years.
...
Oh jeeez... he might as well be Canada's first woman PM.
"Because it's 2015" :roll: He thinks he's in a popularity contest or something. Replace a cunt with a pussy. That's it.
He is dreamy though.
-
Turanian Trashtalker
- Posts: 802
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2015 4:57 am
- Reputation: 286
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests