Why political correctness is failing the world
-
Vutulaki-san
Why political correctness is failing the world
You islamaphobes are about to be put on my shitlist
-
Canuckster
- Posts: 6807
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 5:24 pm
- Reputation: 3108
isn't your shit list just like an everyday list?
People say they all want the truth, but when they are confronted with a truth that disagrees with them, they balk at it as if it were an unwanted zombie apocalypse come to destroy civilization.
Vutu is precisely right, I remember that at my Uni at one of the campuses the bar was shut down. The university tried to claim that it was to make Muslims feel more welcome, the Islamic society basically turned round and wrote on open letter and said (not in these words or course) fuck you to the management and told them that 1. They didn't have an issue with the Uni bar; 2. It was obviously a financial decision rather than any thing about being 'for the students'; 3. The university could fuck right off as they were putting a target on the Muslim students back for no reason at all.
-
Vutulaki-san
Benwahwah wrote:Vutu is precisely right, I remember that at my Uni at one of the campuses the bar was shut down. The university tried to claim that it was to make Muslims feel more welcome, the Islamic society basically turned round and wrote on open letter and said (not in these words or course) fuck you to the management and told them that 1. They didn't have an issue with the Uni bar; 2. It was obviously a financial decision rather than any thing about being 'for the students'; 3. The university could fuck right off as they were putting a target on the Muslim students back for no reason at all.
University pub was running at a loss???
-
Turanian Trashtalker
- Posts: 802
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2015 4:57 am
- Reputation: 286
1) The public, in general, supports "tough on crime policies". New Labour in Britain has shot itself in the foot BIG TIME by openly expressing support for criminals, thugs, and parasite leeches. You can't even defend yourself from burglars in England without going to jail.
When people say they support "helping the poor" with their tax dollars, they're thinking of widows, orphans, and impoverished coal miners... Margaret Thatcher is absolutely hated in north England because of what she did to the working class there. They are not "conservative" when it comes to social policy.
The vast majority of Britons hate having to pay for council housing and benefits for violent chav scum.... Crime is totally out of control in Great Britain. The left openly manipulates statistics to prove that this isn't the case. Go look at the recent scandal in Rotherham, where Paki gangs deliberately raped, kidnapped, and abused thousands of white girls over a period of decades. None of those crimes were ever recorded by the police.
The only reason why the UK has far fewer homicides, per capita, than the US is because British people don't own guns. For instance, stabbings are much more frequent in England than they are in the US.
What does that tell you about the behavior of poor white trash in Britain? Why should the taxpayer have to subsidize their behavior?
The idiot Tory response to this crime wave is to put CCTV cameras everywhere. This not only makes public spaces look ugly, but it is seriously offensive to ordinary, law abiding people. They feel as if they are being punished for other people's crimes.
Meanwhile, let's take a look at America.
Mass incarceration, heavy policing, "stop and frisk", etc. are massively popular among American voters. I've tried to explain this to EY and those other retards at 333 dot COM. They don't support the police because they're ignorant sheeple -- they support the police because the police protect them from a much greater threat. That is, crime by young African American men.
Let me illustrate to you what I'm talking about. This was the average subway car in New York City during the 1980s:
NYC was an absolute cesspool from 1965 to the early 1990s. Times Square was a ghetto full of garbage on the streets, 15 year old pickpockets, and prostitutes advertising themselves at all hours of the day. Nearly everybody who lived in Manhattan could expect to be mugged at least once -- sometimes several times a year, and even during broad daylight. There were over 2000 homicides PER YEAR in NYC.
In 1977, there was an electrical blackout in NYC... Criminals took advantage of the ensuing chaos to loot and destroy the entire city, yielding over $300 million in damages. Meanwhile libtard pundits, politicians, and intellectuals kept making excuses for these thugs... "It's the fault of white racism!" "They're just kids venting their rage!" "We need more welfare to help these criminals!"
And NYC was one of the most socially liberal areas in the entire country... After Mayor Dinkins, New Yorkers refused to vote for another Democrat until 2013. Left wing retardation invites a proportional backlash from the right.
The result, across the entire nation?
Left wing Carter couldn't even win in New England, LMFAO
Flash forward to the present day.
The Black Lives Matter retards shot themselves in the foot big time by crying over thugs and criminals who were shot by cops.
Trayvon Martin was a thug. Freddie Gray was a major thug, with a long rap sheet for every crime from dope dealing to aggravated assault. (and three of the cops who arrested him were black!). Michael Brown was a thug, and was caught on video assaulting a store owner before he was shot by Darren Wilson.
Laquan MacDonald was a major thug who was carjacking on the very day that he was shot down. It doesn't matter if some of these police shootings are unjustified. At the end of the day, black Americans keep creating reasons for other races to fear and despise them.
BLM supporters see themselves as crusaders for social justice. Ordinary people see them as thugs who justify looting, stealing, and mayhem on behalf of petty criminals.
When people say they support "helping the poor" with their tax dollars, they're thinking of widows, orphans, and impoverished coal miners... Margaret Thatcher is absolutely hated in north England because of what she did to the working class there. They are not "conservative" when it comes to social policy.
The vast majority of Britons hate having to pay for council housing and benefits for violent chav scum.... Crime is totally out of control in Great Britain. The left openly manipulates statistics to prove that this isn't the case. Go look at the recent scandal in Rotherham, where Paki gangs deliberately raped, kidnapped, and abused thousands of white girls over a period of decades. None of those crimes were ever recorded by the police.
The only reason why the UK has far fewer homicides, per capita, than the US is because British people don't own guns. For instance, stabbings are much more frequent in England than they are in the US.
What does that tell you about the behavior of poor white trash in Britain? Why should the taxpayer have to subsidize their behavior?
The idiot Tory response to this crime wave is to put CCTV cameras everywhere. This not only makes public spaces look ugly, but it is seriously offensive to ordinary, law abiding people. They feel as if they are being punished for other people's crimes.
Meanwhile, let's take a look at America.
Mass incarceration, heavy policing, "stop and frisk", etc. are massively popular among American voters. I've tried to explain this to EY and those other retards at 333 dot COM. They don't support the police because they're ignorant sheeple -- they support the police because the police protect them from a much greater threat. That is, crime by young African American men.
Let me illustrate to you what I'm talking about. This was the average subway car in New York City during the 1980s:
NYC was an absolute cesspool from 1965 to the early 1990s. Times Square was a ghetto full of garbage on the streets, 15 year old pickpockets, and prostitutes advertising themselves at all hours of the day. Nearly everybody who lived in Manhattan could expect to be mugged at least once -- sometimes several times a year, and even during broad daylight. There were over 2000 homicides PER YEAR in NYC.
In 1977, there was an electrical blackout in NYC... Criminals took advantage of the ensuing chaos to loot and destroy the entire city, yielding over $300 million in damages. Meanwhile libtard pundits, politicians, and intellectuals kept making excuses for these thugs... "It's the fault of white racism!" "They're just kids venting their rage!" "We need more welfare to help these criminals!"
And NYC was one of the most socially liberal areas in the entire country... After Mayor Dinkins, New Yorkers refused to vote for another Democrat until 2013. Left wing retardation invites a proportional backlash from the right.
The result, across the entire nation?
Left wing Carter couldn't even win in New England, LMFAO
Flash forward to the present day.
The Black Lives Matter retards shot themselves in the foot big time by crying over thugs and criminals who were shot by cops.
Trayvon Martin was a thug. Freddie Gray was a major thug, with a long rap sheet for every crime from dope dealing to aggravated assault. (and three of the cops who arrested him were black!). Michael Brown was a thug, and was caught on video assaulting a store owner before he was shot by Darren Wilson.
Laquan MacDonald was a major thug who was carjacking on the very day that he was shot down. It doesn't matter if some of these police shootings are unjustified. At the end of the day, black Americans keep creating reasons for other races to fear and despise them.
BLM supporters see themselves as crusaders for social justice. Ordinary people see them as thugs who justify looting, stealing, and mayhem on behalf of petty criminals.
L Vutulaki wrote:Benwahwah wrote:Vutu is precisely right, I remember that at my Uni at one of the campuses the bar was shut down. The university tried to claim that it was to make Muslims feel more welcome, the Islamic society basically turned round and wrote on open letter and said (not in these words or course) fuck you to the management and told them that 1. They didn't have an issue with the Uni bar; 2. It was obviously a financial decision rather than any thing about being 'for the students'; 3. The university could fuck right off as they were putting a target on the Muslim students back for no reason at all.
University pub was running at a loss???
Slightly before my time, but the current pub (different campus) isn't much better. The university refuses to sell drink and stuff like that at a reduced rate, so some local pubs (like the Wetherspoons chain) are cheaper than the Uni bar. Let's face it, students go where the beer is cheap.
The Uni management isn't all that bright. They will let any fuckwit come, whether you are totally shit or not, chances are we'll take you. I got lucky and got a degree and currently a job out of it, but to be honest they need to sort their shit out rather than going on about how fucking accessible they are.
-
Turanian Trashtalker
- Posts: 802
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2015 4:57 am
- Reputation: 286
2) The public supports responsible and reasonable immigration through a points-based system.
Think of Australia or Canada. Immigrants are only accepted if they prove that they are capable of 1) being functioning members of society, 2) expanding the economy, and 3) integrating into the majority culture.
You are not allowed to immigrate if you are a potential criminal. You are not allowed to immigrate if you have no skills whatsoever. Refugees are not welcome in Australia, and they will be detained for years in a filthy concentration camp if they try to immigrate illegally.
Now compare to Sweden, which imports dirt-poor trash straight from the worst shitholes on Earth. Rape in Sweden has skyrocketed over the past 30 years:
Think of Australia or Canada. Immigrants are only accepted if they prove that they are capable of 1) being functioning members of society, 2) expanding the economy, and 3) integrating into the majority culture.
You are not allowed to immigrate if you are a potential criminal. You are not allowed to immigrate if you have no skills whatsoever. Refugees are not welcome in Australia, and they will be detained for years in a filthy concentration camp if they try to immigrate illegally.
Now compare to Sweden, which imports dirt-poor trash straight from the worst shitholes on Earth. Rape in Sweden has skyrocketed over the past 30 years:
-
Turanian Trashtalker
- Posts: 802
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2015 4:57 am
- Reputation: 286
I know, for an example, that Indians in the UK have lower rates of crime than white Britons, and similar levels of educational attainment.
It's the black Caribbeans (dysfunctional, similar to Afro-Americans) and Muslim Pakis who pose the greatest threat. The UK keeps importing trash from the worst cultures that the Earth has to offer. People are shouted down, censored, or vilified as racists if they even talk about shutting the floodgates.
The public DEEPLY opposes this... In fact the only reason why mass immigration is so unpopular in the UK today is because of these dysfunctional ethnic groups.
...
It's the black Caribbeans (dysfunctional, similar to Afro-Americans) and Muslim Pakis who pose the greatest threat. The UK keeps importing trash from the worst cultures that the Earth has to offer. People are shouted down, censored, or vilified as racists if they even talk about shutting the floodgates.
The public DEEPLY opposes this... In fact the only reason why mass immigration is so unpopular in the UK today is because of these dysfunctional ethnic groups.
...
-
Turanian Trashtalker
- Posts: 802
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2015 4:57 am
- Reputation: 286
3) The public opposes racism, in general, but is sick and tired of political correctness.
They don't hate gays, either, and they support equal treatment of men and women (in principle). But faggotry and feminist retardation pushes them over the edge. The tranny movement (trannies are, what, 0.0001% of the population?) will prove to be the straw that broke the camel's back... Unlike with gays, virtually nobody sympathizes with these freaks, and the more they push trannies into the public sphere, the more terrible the backlash will be.
What does the average female think about Caitlyn Jenner being celebrated as "woman of the year"? Hairy, 6'2" men on estrogen pills who parade around naked in the women's locker room at the gym? Grown men entering the little girl's room? Chicks may feel sorry for fags, but trannies are repulsive on multiple levels. Not only that, but trannies are actively invading their private spaces.
I don't even need to speak further. I've been posting about this for the past three years.
http://www.evilyoshida.com/thread-2254.html
http://www.evilyoshida.com/thread-230.html
They don't hate gays, either, and they support equal treatment of men and women (in principle). But faggotry and feminist retardation pushes them over the edge. The tranny movement (trannies are, what, 0.0001% of the population?) will prove to be the straw that broke the camel's back... Unlike with gays, virtually nobody sympathizes with these freaks, and the more they push trannies into the public sphere, the more terrible the backlash will be.
What does the average female think about Caitlyn Jenner being celebrated as "woman of the year"? Hairy, 6'2" men on estrogen pills who parade around naked in the women's locker room at the gym? Grown men entering the little girl's room? Chicks may feel sorry for fags, but trannies are repulsive on multiple levels. Not only that, but trannies are actively invading their private spaces.
I don't even need to speak further. I've been posting about this for the past three years.
http://www.evilyoshida.com/thread-2254.html
http://www.evilyoshida.com/thread-230.html
-
Vutulaki-san
Benwahwah wrote:L Vutulaki wrote:Benwahwah wrote:Vutu is precisely right, I remember that at my Uni at one of the campuses the bar was shut down. The university tried to claim that it was to make Muslims feel more welcome, the Islamic society basically turned round and wrote on open letter and said (not in these words or course) fuck you to the management and told them that 1. They didn't have an issue with the Uni bar; 2. It was obviously a financial decision rather than any thing about being 'for the students'; 3. The university could fuck right off as they were putting a target on the Muslim students back for no reason at all.
University pub was running at a loss???
Slightly before my time, but the current pub (different campus) isn't much better. The university refuses to sell drink and stuff like that at a reduced rate, so some local pubs (like the Wetherspoons chain) are cheaper than the Uni bar. Let's face it, students go where the beer is cheap.
The Uni management isn't all that bright. They will let any fuckwit come, whether you are totally shit or not, chances are we'll take you. I got lucky and got a degree and currently a job out of it, but to be honest they need to sort their shit out rather than going on about how fucking accessible they are.
That sucks
One of my university bars
http://www.theloftuts.com/
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests