Masato wrote:^ this is great, how old is/was this hearing?
What do you think of the '28 Pages' stuff going on right now? I am guessing you'd agree with me that it is a total Limited Hangout scenario... blaming Saudi Arabia? lol it wasn't Saudi Arabia who stood down NORAD... wasn't SA who confiscated the security cams @ the Pentagon, etc etc etc
Here is a link I've found but haven't gone through yet, also looks interesting:
http://www.abeldanger.net/2016/04/incre ... onist.html
thanks for the vids dude, always nice to see you round here
later!
2004. did you watch? it's good (IMO). it helps shed some light on NORAD, wargames & response (ruppert), how the hijackers were able to enter the US even though some were on terror lists & initially met with resistance (springman), & the US intelligence apparatus' history with this kind of stuff (judge). the letter from sibel edmonds is also a good listen or read. shame it was completely ignored.
re: the 28, I think it is a limited hangout by definition (especially if Obama gets his way & releases the pages with “some degree of declassification”), but not completely. a small piece of a big puzzle. rumor is that israel is also mentioned in those pages & moreso in the footnotes. I do wonder about some of the more cryptic remarks of "foreign governments" or "allies", plural. I would hope that declassifying the 28 would open up people's minds along with a can of 9/11 truth worms. I don't think anyone knows the complete story or ever will.
with that said, I don't think the 28 pages will prove US complicity, but rather a close relationship with parties involved & support (both financially & logistically) from saudi officials within the US & shenanigans within state depts to ensure success of the mission. not sure if there is any mention of the mossad agents that seemed to be mirroring their every move & intimidated the DEA. after that, it’s up to the individual to connect the dots between the house of saud, bush family, CIA, mossad. plenty of material out there. it would also be obvious that there would have had to have been some form of cooperation at the visa, financial & NORAD level. cavemen, SA or mossad wouldn't be able to pull it off without friends in the right places. being that a couple of the alleged hijackers stayed with an FBI agent in CA, it would be interesting to see if & how that is mentioned. it sounds as if that info is included.
"some degree of declassification" could mean a million different things though. like a limited, limited hangout.
I don't think 9/11 is as simple as some people want to make it. IMO, it could very well be a multi-faceted operation with elements of...
saudia arabia providing the perps, financing & logistics
mossad providing intel, cover & demo(?) - MSM "scoop" is that they were just observing.
the US opening doors, issuing visas & standing down with plausible deniability/detachment through the CIA & mossad.
the 'project for a new american century' with both Israel & SA thinking they were in on it.
complex issue. gonna watch those vids here in a bit...