Hitler's definition of 'Socialism'
Re: Hitler's definition of 'Socialism'
^and why I usually don't vote for any of the VILLAINS in order to protect myself from developing WingNUT syndrome and falling victim to the manipulations suffered by those who are infected with that virus!
Luigi wrote:I dont think there are any major world powers who dont crack a few eggs. Its certainly a lot easier to morally justify the Nazis than it is to morally justify Western democracy or Communism.
Exactly. Once war is on and you are threatened to the death, its pretty hard to maintain a moral/ethical highground.
That is sad but war is war.
At the least, the Germans were fighting for SOMETHING. What were allied soldiers fighting for? A bunch of lies and propaganda I figure. What conviction was in their hearts that would drive them to fight/defend, that could have been greater than the Germans?
I understand Raskal's point though. Once you go full on war and start doing terrible things, it becomes difficult if not impossible to hold onto that moral highground.
War is hell
Luigi wrote:They didnt pick the fight with the West, but Barbarossa was a gamble they couldnt afford. Should have played the long game, as communism spread around the world sell themselves as the greatest bulwark against it, influence America using culture and soft power the way Japan does. Of course hindsight is 20/20.
Fascinating post.
I don't think International Jewry would have let that happen. Bolsheviks, Roosevelt, Churchill, all the western banking powers, media, and military might were all given orders to boycott, demonize, & defeat the German nation and culture utterly and completely.
I can't see any scenario where they would have let Germany exist autonomously within its own borders
Germans were fighting for survival, their only hope was to defeat their enemy to a point of proper surrender.
What a story.

