Hitler's definition of 'Socialism'

Politics, History, & 'Conspiracy'
User avatar
theraskal
Posts: 1156
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2023 4:41 pm
Reputation: 389

Re: Hitler's definition of 'Socialism'

Postby theraskal » Thu Aug 17, 2023 4:56 am

^and why I usually don't vote for any of the VILLAINS in order to protect myself from developing WingNUT syndrome and falling victim to the manipulations suffered by those who are infected with that virus!

User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 19313
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 8588

Postby Masato » Thu Aug 17, 2023 12:33 pm

Luigi wrote:I dont think there are any major world powers who dont crack a few eggs. Its certainly a lot easier to morally justify the Nazis than it is to morally justify Western democracy or Communism.


Exactly. Once war is on and you are threatened to the death, its pretty hard to maintain a moral/ethical highground.

That is sad but war is war.

At the least, the Germans were fighting for SOMETHING. What were allied soldiers fighting for? A bunch of lies and propaganda I figure. What conviction was in their hearts that would drive them to fight/defend, that could have been greater than the Germans?

I understand Raskal's point though. Once you go full on war and start doing terrible things, it becomes difficult if not impossible to hold onto that moral highground.

War is hell :(

User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 19313
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 8588

Postby Masato » Thu Aug 17, 2023 12:35 pm

Luigi wrote:They didnt pick the fight with the West, but Barbarossa was a gamble they couldnt afford. Should have played the long game, as communism spread around the world sell themselves as the greatest bulwark against it, influence America using culture and soft power the way Japan does. Of course hindsight is 20/20.


Fascinating post.

I don't think International Jewry would have let that happen. Bolsheviks, Roosevelt, Churchill, all the western banking powers, media, and military might were all given orders to boycott, demonize, & defeat the German nation and culture utterly and completely.
I can't see any scenario where they would have let Germany exist autonomously within its own borders

Germans were fighting for survival, their only hope was to defeat their enemy to a point of proper surrender.

What a story.

User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 19313
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 8588

Postby Masato » Thu Aug 17, 2023 5:03 pm


User avatar
Luigi
Posts: 4405
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 11:01 pm
Reputation: 3071

Postby Luigi » Fri Aug 18, 2023 1:24 am

Masato wrote:
Luigi wrote:They didnt pick the fight with the West, but Barbarossa was a gamble they couldnt afford. Should have played the long game, as communism spread around the world sell themselves as the greatest bulwark against it, influence America using culture and soft power the way Japan does. Of course hindsight is 20/20.


Fascinating post.

I don't think International Jewry would have let that happen. Bolsheviks, Roosevelt, Churchill, all the western banking powers, media, and military might were all given orders to boycott, demonize, & defeat the German nation and culture utterly and completely.
I can't see any scenario where they would have let Germany exist autonomously within its own borders

Germans were fighting for survival, their only hope was to defeat their enemy to a point of proper surrender.

What a story.

There were many machinations across many countries working to bring Germany down, but the enemy of my enemy is a tempting ally. Imagine if USSR didnt have to worry about Germany and used all its resources to quickly crush imperial Japan. America would be in a situation where there was a warg on their Alaskan doorstep, and the most powerful military on earth at that time. So who would be America's ally? France and Britain who were utterly humiliated when they tried to invade Germany? Or would they reluctantly start courting Germany? We will never know for sure of course.
Image

User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 19313
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 8588

Postby Masato » Fri Aug 18, 2023 12:48 pm

Luigi wrote:
Masato wrote:
Luigi wrote:They didnt pick the fight with the West, but Barbarossa was a gamble they couldnt afford. Should have played the long game, as communism spread around the world sell themselves as the greatest bulwark against it, influence America using culture and soft power the way Japan does. Of course hindsight is 20/20.


Fascinating post.

I don't think International Jewry would have let that happen. Bolsheviks, Roosevelt, Churchill, all the western banking powers, media, and military might were all given orders to boycott, demonize, & defeat the German nation and culture utterly and completely.
I can't see any scenario where they would have let Germany exist autonomously within its own borders

Germans were fighting for survival, their only hope was to defeat their enemy to a point of proper surrender.

What a story.

There were many machinations across many countries working to bring Germany down, but the enemy of my enemy is a tempting ally. Imagine if USSR didnt have to worry about Germany and used all its resources to quickly crush imperial Japan. America would be in a situation where there was a warg on their Alaskan doorstep, and the most powerful military on earth at that time. So who would be America's ally? France and Britain who were utterly humiliated when they tried to invade Germany? Or would they reluctantly start courting Germany? We will never know for sure of course.


Love your posts man thanks you

My suspicion (at least today lol) is that USA and Russia were always backdoor allies, and would have not likely gone to war with one another, Germany or no Germany. I think they (Communism and Capitalism) were both more or less under the control of zionists, and continued to be after the war.
Perhaps they would have drawn the Iron Curtain much the same in the end. I think the cold war was faked to build up both armaments, and to this day I still cannot shake the idea that Putin is playing a convenient character, and not really free of the same control. That's where my amateur learningz have led me so far anyways, lol so hard to really know


Someone should write a story 1 day about what if Japan had flattened them all, and was left the lone standing superpower? :D

User avatar
Masato
Site Admin
Posts: 19313
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:16 pm
Reputation: 8588

Postby Masato » Fri Aug 18, 2023 12:50 pm

Masato wrote:
Someone should write a story 1 day about what if Japan had flattened them all, and was left the lone standing superpower? :D
A Japanese anime about how, just at the end, some nerd invents a weapon that decimates the allies, easily. War is over, and Japan can do what it pleases with the world.
Would you watch? :D :D :D

User avatar
Som-Pong
Posts: 7568
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2014 3:17 am
Reputation: 3877

Postby Som-Pong » Sat Aug 19, 2023 3:25 am

Absolutely. The debauched midget yoshida would rule the world


Return to “The Grand Chessboard”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests